head to head · open source
LobeChat vs opencode.nvim
LobeChat has 83,716 GitHub stars, 16,033 forks, 922 open issues and last shipped yesterday. opencode.nvim has 3,904 stars, 161 forks, 6 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. LobeChat leads on adoption by 2,044% (83,716 vs 3,904 stars). LobeChat is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; opencode.nvim is written in Lua under MIT. LobeChat has attracted 19% as many forks as stars, opencode.nvim 4%. LobeChat was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (ai), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| LobeChat | opencode.nvim | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 84K | ★ 3.9K |
| License | Custom / other | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | Lua |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-30 |
| Forks | ⑂ 16K | ⑂ 161 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick LobeChat if
- You weight community size — 84K stars and counting
- You want the Custom / other license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick opencode.nvim if
- You want the opencode.nvim feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Lua
- You evaluated both and opencode.nvim fits your workflow better
About LobeChat
[![][image banner]][vercel link] LobeHub LobeHub organizes your agents into 7×24 operation. It hires, schedules, reports on your entire AI team. You stay in charge — without staying online. English · 简体中文 · [Official Site][official site] · [Changelog][changelog] · [Documents][docs] · [Blog][blog] · [Feedback][github issues link] [![][github release shield]][github release link] [![][docker release shield]][docker release link] [![][vercel shield]][vercel link] [![][discord shield]][discord link] [![][codecov shield]][codecov link] [![][github action test shield]][github action test link] [![][github action…
read the full LobeChat overview →
About opencode.nvim
opencode.nvim Neovim plugin that integrates with OpenCode to keep you in the flow that you already know. ⭐ Motivation AI works best at small, focused scopes — as a pair programmer with the human driving. You stay in control, craft the code that matters, and keep your skills sharp. opencode.nvim just provides the context and connection to make that pairing seamless. Rather than introduce yet another interaction model, opencode.nvim leverages OpenCode's existing TUI and API via standard Neovim interfaces. You keep your environment, your config, your flow. For me, the best tools are the ones that "just work."…
read the full opencode.nvim overview →
More in AI & Machine Learning
Related comparisons
More AI Interaction & Interfaces projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Interaction & Interfaces field.
Frequently asked questions
Is LobeChat or opencode.nvim more popular?
LobeChat has 83,716 GitHub stars and opencode.nvim has 3,904. LobeChat has the larger community by that measure.
Are LobeChat and opencode.nvim free?
Both are open source. LobeChat has no licence declared in this registry, and opencode.nvim is licensed under MIT. Both are free to self-host.
What is the difference between LobeChat and opencode.nvim?
LobeChat is written in TypeScript and opencode.nvim in Lua. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, LobeChat or opencode.nvim?
Choose LobeChat if you want the larger community (83,716 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose opencode.nvim if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.