head to head · open source
LobeChat vs openbrowserclaw
LobeChat has 83,716 GitHub stars, 16,033 forks, 922 open issues and last shipped yesterday. openbrowserclaw has 604 stars, 82 forks, 11 open issues and last shipped 8 months ago. LobeChat leads on adoption by 13,760% (83,716 vs 604 stars). LobeChat is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; openbrowserclaw is written in TypeScript under MIT. LobeChat has attracted 19% as many forks as stars, openbrowserclaw 14%. LobeChat was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (claude), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| LobeChat | openbrowserclaw | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 84K | ★ 604 |
| License | Custom / other | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-02-26 |
| Forks | ⑂ 16K | ⑂ 82 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick LobeChat if
- You weight community size — 84K stars and counting
- You want the Custom / other license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick openbrowserclaw if
- You want the openbrowserclaw feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and openbrowserclaw fits your workflow better
About LobeChat
[![][image banner]][vercel link] LobeHub LobeHub organizes your agents into 7×24 operation. It hires, schedules, reports on your entire AI team. You stay in charge — without staying online. English · 简体中文 · [Official Site][official site] · [Changelog][changelog] · [Documents][docs] · [Blog][blog] · [Feedback][github issues link] [![][github release shield]][github release link] [![][docker release shield]][docker release link] [![][vercel shield]][vercel link] [![][discord shield]][discord link] [![][codecov shield]][codecov link] [![][github action test shield]][github action test link] [![][github action…
read the full LobeChat overview →
About openbrowserclaw
OpenBrowserClaw Disclaimer: OpenBrowserClaw is a personal, open source project. It is not affiliated with any cryptocurrency, meme coin, token, or social media account. If you see coins, tokens, or social media profiles claiming association with this project, they are not legitimate and are not endorsed by the author(s). Stay safe and do your own research. Browser native personal AI assistant. Zero infrastructure — the browser is the server. Built as a browser only reimagination of NanoClaw. Same philosophy, small enough to understand, built for one user, but running entirely in a browser tab. Quick Start Open…
read the full openbrowserclaw overview →
More in AI & Machine Learning
Related comparisons
More AI Interaction & Interfaces projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Interaction & Interfaces field.
Frequently asked questions
Is LobeChat or openbrowserclaw more popular?
LobeChat has 83,716 GitHub stars and openbrowserclaw has 604. LobeChat has the larger community by that measure.
Are LobeChat and openbrowserclaw free?
Both are open source. LobeChat has no licence declared in this registry, and openbrowserclaw is licensed under MIT. Both are free to self-host.
What is the difference between LobeChat and openbrowserclaw?
LobeChat is written in TypeScript and openbrowserclaw in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, LobeChat or openbrowserclaw?
Choose LobeChat if you want the larger community (83,716 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose openbrowserclaw if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.