head to head · open source

LobeChat vs node-telegram-bot-api

LobeChat has 83,687 GitHub stars, 16,028 forks, 922 open issues and last shipped yesterday. node-telegram-bot-api has 9,214 stars, 1,645 forks, 1 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. LobeChat leads on adoption by 808% (83,687 vs 9,214 stars). LobeChat is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; node-telegram-bot-api is written in TypeScript under MIT. LobeChat has attracted 19% as many forks as stars, node-telegram-bot-api 18%. LobeChat was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

LobeChat ★ 84K node-telegram-bot-api ★ 9.2K category AI & Machine Learning

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

LobeChat node-telegram-bot-api
GitHub stars ★ 84K ★ 9.2K
License Custom / other MIT
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-11-02 2026-10-29
Forks ⑂ 16K ⑂ 1.6K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick LobeChat if

  • You weight community size — 84K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full LobeChat profile →

pick node-telegram-bot-api if

  • You want the node-telegram-bot-api feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and node-telegram-bot-api fits your workflow better

full node-telegram-bot-api profile →

About LobeChat

[![][image banner]][vercel link] LobeHub LobeHub organizes your agents into 7×24 operation. It hires, schedules, reports on your entire AI team. You stay in charge — without staying online. English · 简体中文 · [Official Site][official site] · [Changelog][changelog] · [Documents][docs] · [Blog][blog] · [Feedback][github issues link] [![][github release shield]][github release link] [![][docker release shield]][docker release link] [![][vercel shield]][vercel link] [![][discord shield]][discord link] [![][codecov shield]][codecov link] [![][github action test shield]][github action test link] [![][github action…

read the full LobeChat overview →

About node-telegram-bot-api

✨ A Modern Telegram Bot API Library ✨ v2 is a from scratch redesign, no v1 compatibility. Coming from v1? See the v1 v2 migration guide in the changelog. 📦 Install Runs on Bun, modern Node.js, Deno, Cloudflare Workers and Vercel Functions λ 🚀 Usage 📡 Calling the API directly Api mirrors the wire API 1:1 one method per Bot API method, each taking a single params object. 🧩 Middleware koa style middleware around every update; on / command / hears are filters in the same chain. Wrap downstream work with await next() . ⌨️ Keyboards & formatting Structured fields are plain typed objects pass a literal or use a…

read the full node-telegram-bot-api overview →

More in AI & Machine Learning

Related comparisons

More AI Interaction & Interfaces projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Interaction & Interfaces field.

Frequently asked questions

Is LobeChat or node-telegram-bot-api more popular?

LobeChat has 83,687 GitHub stars and node-telegram-bot-api has 9,214. LobeChat has the larger community by that measure.

Are LobeChat and node-telegram-bot-api free?

Both are open source. LobeChat has no licence declared in this registry, and node-telegram-bot-api is licensed under MIT. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between LobeChat and node-telegram-bot-api?

LobeChat is written in TypeScript and node-telegram-bot-api in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, LobeChat or node-telegram-bot-api?

Choose LobeChat if you want the larger community (83,687 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose node-telegram-bot-api if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.