head to head · open source
LobeChat vs NanoClaw
LobeChat has 82,547 GitHub stars, 15,891 forks, 922 open issues and last shipped yesterday. NanoClaw has 30,794 stars, 12,831 forks, 1,102 open issues and last shipped yesterday. LobeChat leads on adoption by 168% (82,547 vs 30,794 stars). LobeChat is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; NanoClaw is written in TypeScript under MIT. LobeChat has attracted 19% as many forks as stars, NanoClaw 42%. LobeChat was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| LobeChat | NanoClaw | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 83K | ★ 31K |
| License | Custom / other | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-17 |
| Forks | ⑂ 16K | ⑂ 13K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick LobeChat if
- You weight community size — 83K stars and counting
- You want the Custom / other license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick NanoClaw if
- You want the NanoClaw feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and NanoClaw fits your workflow better
About LobeChat
LobeHub is an open source platform for managing, building, and operating AI agent teams. It functions as a Chief Agent Operator (CAO), enabling users to organize, schedule, and monitor autonomous AI agents around the clock. The project lives in the AI interaction and interfaces ecosystem, integrating with major LLM providers like OpenAI, Anthropic, DeepSeek, and Alibaba’s GLM series.
read the full LobeChat overview →
About NanoClaw
NanoClaw is a personal AI agent framework that runs lightweight, containerized agents for messaging platforms. It lives in the open source AI agent ecosystem and serves as a security hardened, minimal alternative to OpenClaw. The project prioritizes transparency and control by limiting its codebase to a single process and a handful of files, avoiding the complexity and shared memory risks of larger frameworks.
read the full NanoClaw overview →
More in AI & Machine Learning
Related comparisons
More AI Interaction & Interfaces projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Interaction & Interfaces field.
Frequently asked questions
Is LobeChat or NanoClaw more popular?
LobeChat has 82,547 GitHub stars and NanoClaw has 30,794. LobeChat has the larger community by that measure.
Are LobeChat and NanoClaw free?
Both are open source. LobeChat has no licence declared in this registry, and NanoClaw is licensed under MIT. Both are free to self-host.
What is the difference between LobeChat and NanoClaw?
LobeChat is written in TypeScript and NanoClaw in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, LobeChat or NanoClaw?
Choose LobeChat if you want the larger community (82,547 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose NanoClaw if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.