head to head · open source
LobeChat vs NanoClaw
LobeChat has 83,716 GitHub stars, 16,033 forks, 922 open issues and last shipped yesterday. NanoClaw has 31,073 stars, 12,681 forks, 1,102 open issues and last shipped yesterday. LobeChat leads on adoption by 169% (83,716 vs 31,073 stars). LobeChat is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; NanoClaw is written in TypeScript under MIT. LobeChat has attracted 19% as many forks as stars, NanoClaw 41%. LobeChat was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| LobeChat | NanoClaw | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 84K | ★ 31K |
| License | Custom / other | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 16K | ⑂ 13K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick LobeChat if
- You weight community size — 84K stars and counting
- You want the Custom / other license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick NanoClaw if
- You want the NanoClaw feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and NanoClaw fits your workflow better
About LobeChat
[![][image banner]][vercel link] LobeHub LobeHub organizes your agents into 7×24 operation. It hires, schedules, reports on your entire AI team. You stay in charge — without staying online. English · 简体中文 · [Official Site][official site] · [Changelog][changelog] · [Documents][docs] · [Blog][blog] · [Feedback][github issues link] [![][github release shield]][github release link] [![][docker release shield]][docker release link] [![][vercel shield]][vercel link] [![][discord shield]][discord link] [![][codecov shield]][codecov link] [![][github action test shield]][github action test link] [![][github action…
read the full LobeChat overview →
About NanoClaw
An AI assistant that runs agents securely in their own containers. Lightweight, built to be easily understood and completely customized for your needs. nanoclaw.dev • docs • 中文 • 日本語 • 한국어 • • Agents in Slack: one app per agent Setup provisions each agent its own Slack app: manifest, avatar, and workspace install, no tokens to paste. Spawn teammates from chat: every one gets its own bot identity, container, and memory, with shared rooms and canvases. Why I Built NanoClaw OpenClaw is an impressive project, but I wouldn't have been able to sleep if I had given complex software I didn't understand full access to my…
read the full NanoClaw overview →
More in AI & Machine Learning
Related comparisons
More AI Interaction & Interfaces projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Interaction & Interfaces field.
Frequently asked questions
Is LobeChat or NanoClaw more popular?
LobeChat has 83,716 GitHub stars and NanoClaw has 31,073. LobeChat has the larger community by that measure.
Are LobeChat and NanoClaw free?
Both are open source. LobeChat has no licence declared in this registry, and NanoClaw is licensed under MIT. Both are free to self-host.
What is the difference between LobeChat and NanoClaw?
LobeChat is written in TypeScript and NanoClaw in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, LobeChat or NanoClaw?
Choose LobeChat if you want the larger community (83,716 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose NanoClaw if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.