head to head · open source
LobeChat vs mercury-agent
LobeChat has 83,716 GitHub stars, 16,033 forks, 922 open issues and last shipped yesterday. mercury-agent has 3,768 stars, 388 forks, 60 open issues and last shipped yesterday. LobeChat leads on adoption by 2,122% (83,716 vs 3,768 stars). LobeChat is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; mercury-agent is written in TypeScript under MIT. LobeChat has attracted 19% as many forks as stars, mercury-agent 10%. mercury-agent was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| LobeChat | mercury-agent | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 84K | ★ 3.8K |
| License | Custom / other | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 16K | ⑂ 388 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick LobeChat if
- You weight community size — 84K stars and counting
- You want the Custom / other license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick mercury-agent if
- You want the mercury-agent feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and mercury-agent fits your workflow better
About LobeChat
[![][image banner]][vercel link] LobeHub LobeHub organizes your agents into 7×24 operation. It hires, schedules, reports on your entire AI team. You stay in charge — without staying online. English · 简体中文 · [Official Site][official site] · [Changelog][changelog] · [Documents][docs] · [Blog][blog] · [Feedback][github issues link] [![][github release shield]][github release link] [![][docker release shield]][docker release link] [![][vercel shield]][vercel link] [![][discord shield]][discord link] [![][codecov shield]][codecov link] [![][github action test shield]][github action test link] [![][github action…
read the full LobeChat overview →
About mercury-agent
Soul driven AI agent with permission hardened tools, token budgets, and multi channel access. Remembers what matters. Asks before it acts. Runs 24/7 from CLI, Telegram, or Web. 31 built in tools, Kanban boards, extensible skills, SQLite backed Second Brain memory. 🔖 Current Stable: v1.2.3 English 简体中文 Quick Start One liner install (no Node.js required) — downloads the latest standalone binary for your OS: Or via npm if you already have Node.js 20+: Or install the npm package globally: First run triggers the setup wizard (name, provider, optional Telegram). After setup, Mercury opens the Ink TUI startup screen…
read the full mercury-agent overview →
More in AI & Machine Learning
Related comparisons
More AI Interaction & Interfaces projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Interaction & Interfaces field.
Frequently asked questions
Is LobeChat or mercury-agent more popular?
LobeChat has 83,716 GitHub stars and mercury-agent has 3,768. LobeChat has the larger community by that measure.
Are LobeChat and mercury-agent free?
Both are open source. LobeChat has no licence declared in this registry, and mercury-agent is licensed under MIT. Both are free to self-host.
What is the difference between LobeChat and mercury-agent?
LobeChat is written in TypeScript and mercury-agent in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, LobeChat or mercury-agent?
Choose LobeChat if you want the larger community (83,716 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose mercury-agent if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.