head to head · open source

LobeChat vs magentic

LobeChat has 82,576 GitHub stars, 15,895 forks, 922 open issues and last shipped yesterday. magentic has 2,425 stars, 127 forks, 50 open issues and last shipped 6 months ago. LobeChat leads on adoption by 3,305% (82,576 vs 2,425 stars). LobeChat is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; magentic is written in Python under MIT. LobeChat has attracted 19% as many forks as stars, magentic 5%. LobeChat was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 3 topic tags (agent, ai, chatgpt), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

LobeChat ★ 83K magentic ★ 2.4K category AI & Machine Learning

← all 13541 open source comparisons

Side by side

LobeChat magentic
GitHub stars ★ 83K ★ 2.4K
License Custom / other MIT
Written in TypeScript Python
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-03-11
Forks ⑂ 16K ⑂ 127
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick LobeChat if

  • You weight community size — 83K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full LobeChat profile →

pick magentic if

  • You want the magentic feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and magentic fits your workflow better

full magentic profile →

About LobeChat

LobeHub is an open source platform for managing, building, and operating AI agent teams. It functions as a Chief Agent Operator (CAO), enabling users to organize, schedule, and monitor autonomous AI agents around the clock. The project lives in the AI interaction and interfaces ecosystem, integrating with major LLM providers like OpenAI, Anthropic, DeepSeek, and Alibaba’s GLM series.

read the full LobeChat overview →

About magentic

magentic is an MIT licensed Python library that turns Large Language Model prompts into typed Python functions through the @prompt and @chatprompt decorators, aimed at Python developers who need structured, agentic LLM behavior inside ordinary application code.

read the full magentic overview →

More in AI & Machine Learning

OpenClaw ★ 390K Hermes Agent ★ 247K Ollama ★ 181K Dify ★ 156K Open WebUI ★ 152K langchain ★ 147K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs lobechat openclaw vs hermes-agent openclaw vs opencode openclaw vs n8n openclaw vs open-webui openclaw vs anythingllm hermes-agent vs opencode hermes-agent vs n8n openclaw vs ollama ollama vs llama-cpp ollama vs vllm ollama vs gpt4all ollama vs llama-index ollama vs localai open-webui vs gpt4all llama-cpp vs vllm openclaw vs dify openclaw vs multica openclaw vs langgraph n8n vs dify dify vs langflow dify vs open-webui dify vs langchain dify vs ponytail

More AI Interaction & Interfaces projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Interaction & Interfaces field.

LobeChat vs OpenClaw LobeChat vs Hermes Agent LobeChat vs Open WebUI LobeChat vs odysseus LobeChat vs AnythingLLM LobeChat vs Cherry Studio LobeChat vs nanobot LobeChat vs Jan LobeChat vs LibreChat LobeChat vs chatbox LobeChat vs AstrBot LobeChat vs openhuman

Frequently asked questions

Is LobeChat or magentic more popular?

LobeChat has 82,576 GitHub stars and magentic has 2,425. LobeChat has the larger community by that measure.

Are LobeChat and magentic free?

Both are open source. LobeChat has no licence declared in this registry, and magentic is licensed under MIT. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between LobeChat and magentic?

LobeChat is written in TypeScript and magentic in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, LobeChat or magentic?

Choose LobeChat if you want the larger community (82,576 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose magentic if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.