head to head · open source
LobeChat vs FireRed-OpenStoryline
LobeChat has 83,716 GitHub stars, 16,033 forks, 922 open issues and last shipped yesterday. FireRed-OpenStoryline has 3,619 stars, 422 forks, 30 open issues and last shipped 3 months ago. LobeChat leads on adoption by 2,213% (83,716 vs 3,619 stars). LobeChat is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; FireRed-OpenStoryline is written in Python under Apache-2.0. LobeChat has attracted 19% as many forks as stars, FireRed-OpenStoryline 12%. LobeChat was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (agent), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| LobeChat | FireRed-OpenStoryline | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 84K | ★ 3.6K |
| License | Custom / other | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | TypeScript | Python |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-07-31 |
| Forks | ⑂ 16K | ⑂ 422 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick LobeChat if
- You weight community size — 84K stars and counting
- You want the Custom / other license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick FireRed-OpenStoryline if
- You want the FireRed-OpenStoryline feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and FireRed-OpenStoryline fits your workflow better
About LobeChat
[![][image banner]][vercel link] LobeHub LobeHub organizes your agents into 7×24 operation. It hires, schedules, reports on your entire AI team. You stay in charge — without staying online. English · 简体中文 · [Official Site][official site] · [Changelog][changelog] · [Documents][docs] · [Blog][blog] · [Feedback][github issues link] [![][github release shield]][github release link] [![][docker release shield]][docker release link] [![][vercel shield]][vercel link] [![][discord shield]][discord link] [![][codecov shield]][codecov link] [![][github action test shield]][github action test link] [![][github action…
read the full LobeChat overview →
About FireRed-OpenStoryline
🇨🇳 简体中文 🌏 English 🤗 HuggingFace Demo • 🌐 Homepage FireRed OpenStoryline turns complex video creation into natural, intuitive conversations. Designed with both accessibility and enterprise grade reliability in mind, FireRed OpenStoryline makes video creation easy and friendly to beginners and creative enthusiasts alike. Deriving from the saying "A single spark can start a prairie fire", the name FireRed represents our vision: to spread our SOTA capabilities—honed in real world scenarios—like sparks across the wilderness, igniting the imagination of developers worldwide to reshape the future of AI together. ✨…
read the full FireRed-OpenStoryline overview →
More in AI & Machine Learning
Related comparisons
More AI Interaction & Interfaces projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Interaction & Interfaces field.
Frequently asked questions
Is LobeChat or FireRed-OpenStoryline more popular?
LobeChat has 83,716 GitHub stars and FireRed-OpenStoryline has 3,619. LobeChat has the larger community by that measure.
Are LobeChat and FireRed-OpenStoryline free?
Both are open source. LobeChat has no licence declared in this registry, and FireRed-OpenStoryline is licensed under Apache-2.0. Both are free to self-host.
What is the difference between LobeChat and FireRed-OpenStoryline?
LobeChat is written in TypeScript and FireRed-OpenStoryline in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, LobeChat or FireRed-OpenStoryline?
Choose LobeChat if you want the larger community (83,716 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose FireRed-OpenStoryline if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.