head to head · open source
LobeChat vs ctxport
LobeChat has 83,716 GitHub stars, 16,033 forks, 922 open issues and last shipped yesterday. ctxport has 653 stars, 135 forks, 9 open issues and last shipped 8 months ago. LobeChat leads on adoption by 12,720% (83,716 vs 653 stars). LobeChat is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; ctxport is written in TypeScript under MIT. LobeChat has attracted 19% as many forks as stars, ctxport 21%. LobeChat was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 4 topic tags (ai, chatgpt, claude, deepseek), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| LobeChat | ctxport | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 84K | ★ 653 |
| License | Custom / other | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-03-04 |
| Forks | ⑂ 16K | ⑂ 135 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick LobeChat if
- You weight community size — 84K stars and counting
- You want the Custom / other license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick ctxport if
- You want the ctxport feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and ctxport fits your workflow better
About LobeChat
[![][image banner]][vercel link] LobeHub LobeHub organizes your agents into 7×24 operation. It hires, schedules, reports on your entire AI team. You stay in charge — without staying online. English · 简体中文 · [Official Site][official site] · [Changelog][changelog] · [Documents][docs] · [Blog][blog] · [Feedback][github issues link] [![][github release shield]][github release link] [![][docker release shield]][docker release link] [![][vercel shield]][vercel link] [![][discord shield]][discord link] [![][codecov shield]][codecov link] [![][github action test shield]][github action test link] [![][github action…
read the full LobeChat overview →
About ctxport
CtxPort One click. Structured Markdown. Any AI conversation. Your AI conversations deserve a better clipboard. 简体中文 English Supported Platforms Get Started · Features · Documentation The Problem You just spent 45 minutes in a deep conversation with ChatGPT. You found the perfect architecture for your project. Now you need to share it with Claude for implementation. What do you do? Ctrl+A, Ctrl+C? You get a mess of HTML artifacts, broken formatting, and missing code blocks. Copy each message manually? Life is too short. Screenshot it? Text in images is where knowledge goes to die. AI conversations are the new…
read the full ctxport overview →
More in AI & Machine Learning
Related comparisons
More AI Interaction & Interfaces projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Interaction & Interfaces field.
Frequently asked questions
Is LobeChat or ctxport more popular?
LobeChat has 83,716 GitHub stars and ctxport has 653. LobeChat has the larger community by that measure.
Are LobeChat and ctxport free?
Both are open source. LobeChat has no licence declared in this registry, and ctxport is licensed under MIT. Both are free to self-host.
What is the difference between LobeChat and ctxport?
LobeChat is written in TypeScript and ctxport in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, LobeChat or ctxport?
Choose LobeChat if you want the larger community (83,716 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose ctxport if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.