head to head · open source

LobeChat vs Corpus

LobeChat has 82,547 GitHub stars, 15,891 forks, 922 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Corpus has 13 stars, 0 forks, 25 open issues and last shipped 3 months ago. LobeChat leads on adoption by 634,877% (82,547 vs 13 stars). LobeChat is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; Corpus is written in Python under AGPL-3.0. LobeChat has attracted 19% as many forks as stars, Corpus 0%. LobeChat was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

LobeChat ★ 83K Corpus ★ 13 category AI & Machine Learning

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

LobeChat Corpus
GitHub stars ★ 83K ★ 13
License Custom / other AGPL-3.0
Written in TypeScript Python
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-06-26
Forks ⑂ 16K ⑂ 0
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick LobeChat if

  • You weight community size — 83K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full LobeChat profile →

pick Corpus if

  • You want the Corpus feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and Corpus fits your workflow better

full Corpus profile →

About LobeChat

LobeHub is an open source platform for managing, building, and operating AI agent teams. It functions as a Chief Agent Operator (CAO), enabling users to organize, schedule, and monitor autonomous AI agents around the clock. The project lives in the AI interaction and interfaces ecosystem, integrating with major LLM providers like OpenAI, Anthropic, DeepSeek, and Alibaba’s GLM series.

read the full LobeChat overview →

About Corpus

Corpus is an open source, self hosted document Q&A system that ingests PDFs and web pages, answers natural language questions with citations back to source text, and is aimed at teams and individuals who need grounded answers across a private document collection rather than across the public web.

read the full Corpus overview →

More in AI & Machine Learning

OpenClaw ★ 390K Hermes Agent ★ 246K Ollama ★ 181K Dify ★ 156K Open WebUI ★ 152K langchain ★ 147K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs lobechat openclaw vs hermes-agent openclaw vs open-webui openclaw vs anythingllm openclaw vs cherry-studio openclaw vs nanobot openclaw vs jan openclaw vs librechat ollama vs llama-cpp ollama vs vllm ollama vs gpt4all ollama vs llama-index ollama vs localai llama-cpp vs vllm ollama vs pageindex ollama vs langfuse dify vs langchain dify vs ponytail langchain vs ponytail dify vs graphify langchain vs graphify ponytail vs graphify dify vs claude-mem dify vs ragflow

More AI Interaction & Interfaces projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Interaction & Interfaces field.

LobeChat vs OpenClaw LobeChat vs Hermes Agent LobeChat vs Open WebUI LobeChat vs AnythingLLM LobeChat vs Cherry Studio LobeChat vs nanobot LobeChat vs Jan LobeChat vs LibreChat LobeChat vs chatbox LobeChat vs AstrBot LobeChat vs openhuman LobeChat vs Langchain-Chatchat

Frequently asked questions

Is LobeChat or Corpus more popular?

LobeChat has 82,547 GitHub stars and Corpus has 13. LobeChat has the larger community by that measure.

Are LobeChat and Corpus free?

Both are open source. LobeChat has no licence declared in this registry, and Corpus is licensed under AGPL-3.0. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between LobeChat and Corpus?

LobeChat is written in TypeScript and Corpus in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, LobeChat or Corpus?

Choose LobeChat if you want the larger community (82,547 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose Corpus if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.