head to head · open source
LobeChat vs claude-chat-exporter
LobeChat has 83,716 GitHub stars, 16,033 forks, 922 open issues and last shipped yesterday. claude-chat-exporter has 741 stars, 85 forks, 1 open issues and last shipped 11 days ago. LobeChat leads on adoption by 11,198% (83,716 vs 741 stars). LobeChat is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; claude-chat-exporter is written in JavaScript under MIT. LobeChat has attracted 19% as many forks as stars, claude-chat-exporter 11%. LobeChat was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (claude), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| LobeChat | claude-chat-exporter | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 84K | ★ 741 |
| License | Custom / other | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | JavaScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-23 |
| Forks | ⑂ 16K | ⑂ 85 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick LobeChat if
- You weight community size — 84K stars and counting
- You want the Custom / other license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick claude-chat-exporter if
- You want the claude-chat-exporter feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You evaluated both and claude-chat-exporter fits your workflow better
About LobeChat
[![][image banner]][vercel link] LobeHub LobeHub organizes your agents into 7×24 operation. It hires, schedules, reports on your entire AI team. You stay in charge — without staying online. English · 简体中文 · [Official Site][official site] · [Changelog][changelog] · [Documents][docs] · [Blog][blog] · [Feedback][github issues link] [![][github release shield]][github release link] [![][docker release shield]][docker release link] [![][vercel shield]][vercel link] [![][discord shield]][discord link] [![][codecov shield]][codecov link] [![][github action test shield]][github action test link] [![][github action…
read the full LobeChat overview →
About claude-chat-exporter
Claude Chat Exporter A privacy first tool that exports your Claude.ai conversations to clean Markdown. It runs entirely in your browser — no server of its own, nothing uploaded, no tracking. Everything comes through — tables, math and code at full fidelity, plus artifacts, created files, charts and attachments — all read directly from Claude's own API. Exports carry YAML frontmatter with one heading per turn, so they drop straight into an Obsidian vault or a RAG pipeline. Claude's internal API changes without notice, and someone has to keep up. Sponsoring this project is what keeps it maintained. More → ⚡ One…
read the full claude-chat-exporter overview →
More in AI & Machine Learning
Related comparisons
More AI Interaction & Interfaces projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Interaction & Interfaces field.
Frequently asked questions
Is LobeChat or claude-chat-exporter more popular?
LobeChat has 83,716 GitHub stars and claude-chat-exporter has 741. LobeChat has the larger community by that measure.
Are LobeChat and claude-chat-exporter free?
Both are open source. LobeChat has no licence declared in this registry, and claude-chat-exporter is licensed under MIT. Both are free to self-host.
What is the difference between LobeChat and claude-chat-exporter?
LobeChat is written in TypeScript and claude-chat-exporter in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, LobeChat or claude-chat-exporter?
Choose LobeChat if you want the larger community (83,716 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose claude-chat-exporter if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.