head to head · open source

LobeChat vs claude-agents-library

LobeChat has 83,716 GitHub stars, 16,033 forks, 922 open issues and last shipped yesterday. claude-agents-library has 757 stars, 121 forks, 1 open issues and last shipped 7 months ago. LobeChat leads on adoption by 10,959% (83,716 vs 757 stars). LobeChat is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; claude-agents-library is written in various languages under MIT. LobeChat has attracted 19% as many forks as stars, claude-agents-library 16%. LobeChat was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

LobeChat ★ 84K claude-agents-library ★ 757 category AI & Machine Learning

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

LobeChat claude-agents-library
GitHub stars ★ 84K ★ 757
License Custom / other MIT
Written in TypeScript —
Last push 2026-11-02 2026-04-14
Forks ⑂ 16K ⑂ 121
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick LobeChat if

  • You weight community size — 84K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full LobeChat profile →

pick claude-agents-library if

  • You want the claude-agents-library feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • You evaluated both and claude-agents-library fits your workflow better

full claude-agents-library profile →

About LobeChat

[![][image banner]][vercel link] LobeHub LobeHub organizes your agents into 7×24 operation. It hires, schedules, reports on your entire AI team. You stay in charge — without staying online. English · 简体中文 · [Official Site][official site] · [Changelog][changelog] · [Documents][docs] · [Blog][blog] · [Feedback][github issues link] [![][github release shield]][github release link] [![][docker release shield]][docker release link] [![][vercel shield]][vercel link] [![][discord shield]][discord link] [![][codecov shield]][codecov link] [![][github action test shield]][github action test link] [![][github action…

read the full LobeChat overview →

About claude-agents-library

🤖 Claude Agents Library 34 Production Ready AI Agents for Claude — Copy, paste, and customize for any professional role Quick Start • Find an Agent • Categories • MCP Integration • Cost Optimization • www.aiagentskit.com 📖 Table of Contents What's New What is This? Why Use Agents? Quick Agent Finder Categories The Agents Quick Start MCP Integration Cost Optimization Customization Contributing Resources 🆕 What's New in v1.2 (January 16, 2026) [!NOTE] Latest update brings powerful new features for cost optimization and productivity! ✅ 7 MCP Integration Patterns — Copy paste workflows with code examples ✅ Model…

read the full claude-agents-library overview →

More in AI & Machine Learning

Related comparisons

More AI Interaction & Interfaces projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Interaction & Interfaces field.

Frequently asked questions

Is LobeChat or claude-agents-library more popular?

LobeChat has 83,716 GitHub stars and claude-agents-library has 757. LobeChat has the larger community by that measure.

Are LobeChat and claude-agents-library free?

Both are open source. LobeChat has no licence declared in this registry, and claude-agents-library is licensed under MIT. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between LobeChat and claude-agents-library?

LobeChat is written in TypeScript and claude-agents-library in various languages. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, LobeChat or claude-agents-library?

Choose LobeChat if you want the larger community (83,716 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose claude-agents-library if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.