head to head · open source

LobeChat vs cindy

LobeChat has 83,716 GitHub stars, 16,033 forks, 922 open issues and last shipped yesterday. cindy has 9,009 stars, 1,086 forks, 1,390 open issues and last shipped yesterday. LobeChat leads on adoption by 829% (83,716 vs 9,009 stars). LobeChat is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; cindy is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0. LobeChat has attracted 19% as many forks as stars, cindy 12%. cindy was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (agent), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

LobeChat ★ 84K cindy ★ 9.0K category AI & Machine Learning

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

LobeChat cindy
GitHub stars ★ 84K ★ 9.0K
License Custom / other Apache-2.0
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-11-02 2026-11-02
Forks ⑂ 16K ⑂ 1.1K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick LobeChat if

  • You weight community size — 84K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full LobeChat profile →

pick cindy if

  • You want the cindy feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and cindy fits your workflow better

full cindy profile →

About LobeChat

[![][image banner]][vercel link] LobeHub LobeHub organizes your agents into 7×24 operation. It hires, schedules, reports on your entire AI team. You stay in charge — without staying online. English · 简体中文 · [Official Site][official site] · [Changelog][changelog] · [Documents][docs] · [Blog][blog] · [Feedback][github issues link] [![][github release shield]][github release link] [![][docker release shield]][docker release link] [![][vercel shield]][vercel link] [![][discord shield]][discord link] [![][codecov shield]][codecov link] [![][github action test shield]][github action test link] [![][github action…

read the full LobeChat overview →

About cindy

English · 简体中文 🌐 cindy.app · ⬇️ Download Cindy is an open source AI agent that works out of the box. She brings multiple harnesses, models and tools into one agent that finishes real work in your projects and apps. Ready from day one, yours to shape over time. Cindy runs locally on your own machine, using your real files and logged in apps. The first supported harnesses are Claude Code and Codex — more are being added, and a native harness is in the works. Models and harnesses mix freely and can switch mid task while your workspace, memory, skills and tools stay continuous; one task can even be planned…

read the full cindy overview →

More in AI & Machine Learning

Related comparisons

More AI Interaction & Interfaces projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Interaction & Interfaces field.

Frequently asked questions

Is LobeChat or cindy more popular?

LobeChat has 83,716 GitHub stars and cindy has 9,009. LobeChat has the larger community by that measure.

Are LobeChat and cindy free?

Both are open source. LobeChat has no licence declared in this registry, and cindy is licensed under Apache-2.0. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between LobeChat and cindy?

LobeChat is written in TypeScript and cindy in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, LobeChat or cindy?

Choose LobeChat if you want the larger community (83,716 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose cindy if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.