head to head · open source
LobeChat vs chatgpt_telegram_bot
LobeChat has 83,716 GitHub stars, 16,033 forks, 922 open issues and last shipped yesterday. chatgpt_telegram_bot has 5,551 stars, 1,907 forks, 56 open issues and last shipped 5 months ago. LobeChat leads on adoption by 1,408% (83,716 vs 5,551 stars). LobeChat is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; chatgpt_telegram_bot is written in Python under MIT. LobeChat has attracted 19% as many forks as stars, chatgpt_telegram_bot 34%. LobeChat was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| LobeChat | chatgpt_telegram_bot | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 84K | ★ 5.6K |
| License | Custom / other | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | Python |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-06-14 |
| Forks | ⑂ 16K | ⑂ 1.9K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick LobeChat if
- You weight community size — 84K stars and counting
- You want the Custom / other license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick chatgpt_telegram_bot if
- You want the chatgpt_telegram_bot feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and chatgpt_telegram_bot fits your workflow better
About LobeChat
[![][image banner]][vercel link] LobeHub LobeHub organizes your agents into 7×24 operation. It hires, schedules, reports on your entire AI team. You stay in charge — without staying online. English · 简体中文 · [Official Site][official site] · [Changelog][changelog] · [Documents][docs] · [Blog][blog] · [Feedback][github issues link] [![][github release shield]][github release link] [![][docker release shield]][docker release link] [![][vercel shield]][vercel link] [![][discord shield]][discord link] [![][codecov shield]][codecov link] [![][github action test shield]][github action test link] [![][github action…
read the full LobeChat overview →
About chatgpt_telegram_bot
🤖 ChatGPT Telegram Bot ChatGPT, re created as a Telegram bot — and it works great. GPT 5.5 · Anthropic Claude (Opus / Sonnet / Haiku) · Vision · Voice · Image generation Fast replies, no daily limits, message streaming and 15 special chat modes. Web chatbots are great — but they're often laggy, rate limited, and locked behind a browser tab. This project puts the best models from OpenAI and Anthropic right inside Telegram , with your own API keys and no daily limits. 🚀 Try the live bot: @jadvebot · 🌐 Web: jadve.com — or deploy your own in two commands (Quick start ↓). ✨ Features ⚡ Low latency — replies usually…
read the full chatgpt_telegram_bot overview →
More in AI & Machine Learning
Related comparisons
More AI Interaction & Interfaces projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Interaction & Interfaces field.
Frequently asked questions
Is LobeChat or chatgpt_telegram_bot more popular?
LobeChat has 83,716 GitHub stars and chatgpt_telegram_bot has 5,551. LobeChat has the larger community by that measure.
Are LobeChat and chatgpt_telegram_bot free?
Both are open source. LobeChat has no licence declared in this registry, and chatgpt_telegram_bot is licensed under MIT. Both are free to self-host.
What is the difference between LobeChat and chatgpt_telegram_bot?
LobeChat is written in TypeScript and chatgpt_telegram_bot in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, LobeChat or chatgpt_telegram_bot?
Choose LobeChat if you want the larger community (83,716 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose chatgpt_telegram_bot if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.