head to head · open source

LobeChat vs chatgpt-android

LobeChat has 83,716 GitHub stars, 16,033 forks, 922 open issues and last shipped yesterday. chatgpt-android has 3,874 stars, 449 forks, 27 open issues and last shipped 10 months ago. LobeChat leads on adoption by 2,061% (83,716 vs 3,874 stars). LobeChat is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; chatgpt-android is written in Kotlin under Apache-2.0. LobeChat has attracted 19% as many forks as stars, chatgpt-android 12%. LobeChat was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (chatgpt), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

LobeChat ★ 84K chatgpt-android ★ 3.9K category AI & Machine Learning

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

LobeChat chatgpt-android
GitHub stars ★ 84K ★ 3.9K
License Custom / other Apache-2.0
Written in TypeScript Kotlin
Last push 2026-11-02 2026-01-03
Forks ⑂ 16K ⑂ 449
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick LobeChat if

  • You weight community size — 84K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full LobeChat profile →

pick chatgpt-android if

  • You want the chatgpt-android feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Kotlin
  • You evaluated both and chatgpt-android fits your workflow better

full chatgpt-android profile →

About LobeChat

[![][image banner]][vercel link] LobeHub LobeHub organizes your agents into 7×24 operation. It hires, schedules, reports on your entire AI team. You stay in charge — without staying online. English · 简体中文 · [Official Site][official site] · [Changelog][changelog] · [Documents][docs] · [Blog][blog] · [Feedback][github issues link] [![][github release shield]][github release link] [![][docker release shield]][docker release link] [![][vercel shield]][vercel link] [![][discord shield]][discord link] [![][codecov shield]][codecov link] [![][github action test shield]][github action test link] [![][github action…

read the full LobeChat overview →

About chatgpt-android

ChatGPT Android demonstrates OpenAI's ChatGPT on Android with Stream Chat SDK for Compose. The primary objective of this repository is to showcase the following: Demonstrating OpenAI's chat APIs. Creating comprehensive UI elements utilizing Jetpack Compose. Incorporating Android architecture components using Jetpack libraries such as Hilt and AppStartup. Executing background tasks efficiently through Kotlin Coroutines and WorkManager. Seamlessly integrating chat systems via the Stream Chat SDK for Compose to facilitate real time event handling. 📷 Previews 🛥 Stream Chat & Video SDKs ChatGPT Android is built…

read the full chatgpt-android overview →

More in AI & Machine Learning

Related comparisons

More AI Interaction & Interfaces projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Interaction & Interfaces field.

Frequently asked questions

Is LobeChat or chatgpt-android more popular?

LobeChat has 83,716 GitHub stars and chatgpt-android has 3,874. LobeChat has the larger community by that measure.

Are LobeChat and chatgpt-android free?

Both are open source. LobeChat has no licence declared in this registry, and chatgpt-android is licensed under Apache-2.0. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between LobeChat and chatgpt-android?

LobeChat is written in TypeScript and chatgpt-android in Kotlin. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, LobeChat or chatgpt-android?

Choose LobeChat if you want the larger community (83,716 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose chatgpt-android if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.