head to head · open source

LobeChat vs BotFramework-WebChat

LobeChat has 83,687 GitHub stars, 16,028 forks, 922 open issues and last shipped yesterday. BotFramework-WebChat has 1,786 stars, 1,600 forks, 523 open issues and last shipped yesterday. LobeChat leads on adoption by 4,586% (83,687 vs 1,786 stars). LobeChat is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; BotFramework-WebChat is written in HTML under MIT. LobeChat has attracted 19% as many forks as stars, BotFramework-WebChat 90%. LobeChat was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

LobeChat ★ 84K BotFramework-WebChat ★ 1.8K category AI & Machine Learning

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

LobeChat BotFramework-WebChat
GitHub stars ★ 84K ★ 1.8K
License Custom / other MIT
Written in TypeScript HTML
Last push 2026-11-02 2026-11-02
Forks ⑂ 16K ⑂ 1.6K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick LobeChat if

  • You weight community size — 84K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full LobeChat profile →

pick BotFramework-WebChat if

  • You want the BotFramework-WebChat feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches HTML
  • You evaluated both and BotFramework-WebChat fits your workflow better

full BotFramework-WebChat profile →

About LobeChat

[![][image banner]][vercel link] LobeHub LobeHub organizes your agents into 7×24 operation. It hires, schedules, reports on your entire AI team. You stay in charge — without staying online. English · 简体中文 · [Official Site][official site] · [Changelog][changelog] · [Documents][docs] · [Blog][blog] · [Feedback][github issues link] [![][github release shield]][github release link] [![][docker release shield]][docker release link] [![][vercel shield]][vercel link] [![][discord shield]][discord link] [![][codecov shield]][codecov link] [![][github action test shield]][github action test link] [![][github action…

read the full LobeChat overview →

About BotFramework-WebChat

Click here to find out what is new in Web Chat Bot Framework Web Chat This repository contains code for the Bot Framework Web Chat component. The Bot Framework Web Chat component is a highly customizable web based client for the Bot Framework v4 SDK. The Bot Framework SDK v4 enables developers to model conversation and build sophisticated bot applications. This repository is part of the Microsoft Bot Framework a comprehensive framework for building enterprise grade conversational AI experiences. Web Chat supports Content Security Policy (CSP). Web developers are recommended to enable CSP to improve security and…

read the full BotFramework-WebChat overview →

More in AI & Machine Learning

Related comparisons

More AI Interaction & Interfaces projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Interaction & Interfaces field.

Frequently asked questions

Is LobeChat or BotFramework-WebChat more popular?

LobeChat has 83,687 GitHub stars and BotFramework-WebChat has 1,786. LobeChat has the larger community by that measure.

Are LobeChat and BotFramework-WebChat free?

Both are open source. LobeChat has no licence declared in this registry, and BotFramework-WebChat is licensed under MIT. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between LobeChat and BotFramework-WebChat?

LobeChat is written in TypeScript and BotFramework-WebChat in HTML. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, LobeChat or BotFramework-WebChat?

Choose LobeChat if you want the larger community (83,687 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose BotFramework-WebChat if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.