head to head · open source

llama.cpp vs lorax

llama.cpp has 128,581 GitHub stars, 23,334 forks, 2,464 open issues and last shipped yesterday. lorax has 3,832 stars, 324 forks, 189 open issues and last shipped 4 months ago. llama.cpp leads on adoption by 3,255% (128,581 vs 3,832 stars). llama.cpp is written in C++ under MIT; lorax is written in Python under Apache-2.0. llama.cpp has attracted 18% as many forks as stars, lorax 8%. llama.cpp was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

llama.cpp ★ 129K lorax ★ 3.8K category AI & Machine Learning

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

llama.cpp lorax
GitHub stars ★ 129K ★ 3.8K
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in C++ Python
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-05-28
Forks ⑂ 23K ⑂ 324
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick llama.cpp if

  • You weight community size — 129K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches C++
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full llama.cpp profile →

pick lorax if

  • You want the lorax feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and lorax fits your workflow better

full lorax profile →

About llama.cpp

llama.cpp is a C/C++ library and set of command line tools for running large language models (LLMs) and vision language models (VLMs) locally. It enables inference without external dependencies, targeting diverse hardware including Apple Silicon, x86 CPUs, NVIDIA GPUs (via CUDA), AMD GPUs (via HIP), and other accelerators. The project lives in the ggml ecosystem, leveraging the ggml tensor computation library for low level operations and quantized model execution.

read the full llama.cpp overview →

About lorax

LoRAX, short for LoRA eXchange, is an open source Python framework for serving many fine tuned large language models from a single GPU. It lives in machine learning infrastructure and uses base models with LoRA adapters. The base model is shared across requests, while task specific adapter weights are loaded dynamically for each request.

read the full lorax overview →

More in AI & Machine Learning

OpenClaw ★ 390K Hermes Agent ★ 246K Ollama ★ 181K Dify ★ 156K Open WebUI ★ 152K langchain ★ 147K

Related comparisons

ollama vs llama-cpp llama-cpp vs vllm ollama vs vllm ollama vs gpt4all ollama vs llama-index ollama vs localai ollama vs pageindex ollama vs langfuse openclaw vs hermes-agent openclaw vs open-webui openclaw vs lobechat openclaw vs anythingllm openclaw vs cherry-studio openclaw vs nanobot openclaw vs jan openclaw vs librechat dify vs langchain dify vs ponytail langchain vs ponytail dify vs graphify langchain vs graphify ponytail vs graphify dify vs claude-mem dify vs ragflow

More Machine Learning Infrastructure projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Machine Learning Infrastructure field.

llama.cpp vs Ollama llama.cpp vs vllm llama.cpp vs GPT4All llama.cpp vs llama_index llama.cpp vs LocalAI llama.cpp vs PageIndex llama.cpp vs Langfuse llama.cpp vs cognee llama.cpp vs taipy llama.cpp vs dagster llama.cpp vs zvec llama.cpp vs langchain4j

Frequently asked questions

Is llama.cpp or lorax more popular?

llama.cpp has 128,581 GitHub stars and lorax has 3,832. llama.cpp has the larger community by that measure.

Are llama.cpp and lorax free?

Both are open source. llama.cpp is licensed under MIT and lorax under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between llama.cpp and lorax?

llama.cpp is written in C++ and lorax in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, llama.cpp or lorax?

Choose llama.cpp if you want the larger community (128,581 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose lorax if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.