head to head · open source
llama.cpp vs dagster
llama.cpp has 128,581 GitHub stars, 23,334 forks, 2,464 open issues and last shipped yesterday. dagster has 16,169 stars, 2,294 forks, 2,589 open issues and last shipped yesterday. llama.cpp leads on adoption by 695% (128,581 vs 16,169 stars). llama.cpp is written in C++ under MIT; dagster is written in Python under Apache-2.0. llama.cpp has attracted 18% as many forks as stars, dagster 14%. dagster was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| llama.cpp | dagster | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 129K | ★ 16K |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | C++ | Python |
| Last push | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-17 |
| Forks | ⑂ 23K | ⑂ 2.3K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick llama.cpp if
- You weight community size — 129K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches C++
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick dagster if
- You want the dagster feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and dagster fits your workflow better
About llama.cpp
llama.cpp is a C/C++ library and set of command line tools for running large language models (LLMs) and vision language models (VLMs) locally. It enables inference without external dependencies, targeting diverse hardware including Apple Silicon, x86 CPUs, NVIDIA GPUs (via CUDA), AMD GPUs (via HIP), and other accelerators. The project lives in the ggml ecosystem, leveraging the ggml tensor computation library for low level operations and quantized model execution.
read the full llama.cpp overview →
About dagster
Dagster is a cloud native data pipeline orchestrator written in Python and released under the Apache 2.0 licence, built for data engineers, data scientists, and machine learning teams who declare the tables, data sets, models, and reports their pipelines should produce and need those assets tested, observable, and kept up to date from local development through production.
read the full dagster overview →
More in AI & Machine Learning
Related comparisons
More Machine Learning Infrastructure projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Machine Learning Infrastructure field.
Frequently asked questions
Is llama.cpp or dagster more popular?
llama.cpp has 128,581 GitHub stars and dagster has 16,169. llama.cpp has the larger community by that measure.
Are llama.cpp and dagster free?
Both are open source. llama.cpp is licensed under MIT and dagster under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between llama.cpp and dagster?
llama.cpp is written in C++ and dagster in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, llama.cpp or dagster?
Choose llama.cpp if you want the larger community (128,581 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose dagster if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.