head to head · open source

LightRAG vs neo4j

LightRAG has 39,738 GitHub stars, 5,589 forks, 222 open issues and last shipped today. neo4j has 17,241 stars, 2,703 forks, 252 open issues and last shipped 8 days ago. LightRAG leads on adoption by 130% (39,738 vs 17,241 stars). LightRAG is written in Python under MIT; neo4j is written in Java under GPL-3.0. LightRAG has attracted 14% as many forks as stars, neo4j 16%. LightRAG was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

LightRAG ★ 40K neo4j ★ 17K category AI & Machine Learning

← all 13541 open source comparisons

Side by side

LightRAG neo4j
GitHub stars ★ 40K ★ 17K
License MIT GPL-3.0
Written in Python Java
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-10
Forks ⑂ 5.6K ⑂ 2.7K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick LightRAG if

  • You weight community size — 40K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full LightRAG profile →

pick neo4j if

  • You want the neo4j feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You evaluated both and neo4j fits your workflow better

full neo4j profile →

About LightRAG

LightRAG is a Python retrieval augmented generation framework, released under the MIT licence and presented in an EMNLP 2025 paper, that builds a knowledge graph over documents so that queries can be answered from both graph structure and vector similarity.

read the full LightRAG overview →

About neo4j

Neo4j is a Java graph database released under GPL 3.0 that stores data as nodes and relationships and queries it with Cypher, aimed at developers, data engineers, and platform teams building connected data applications who would otherwise model those relationships as tables and joins.

read the full neo4j overview →

More in AI & Machine Learning

OpenClaw ★ 390K Hermes Agent ★ 247K Ollama ★ 181K Dify ★ 156K Open WebUI ★ 152K langchain ★ 147K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs dify openclaw vs multica openclaw vs langgraph n8n vs dify dify vs langflow dify vs open-webui dify vs langchain dify vs ponytail openclaw vs hermes-agent openclaw vs opencode openclaw vs n8n openclaw vs open-webui openclaw vs lobechat openclaw vs anythingllm hermes-agent vs opencode hermes-agent vs n8n openclaw vs ollama ollama vs llama-cpp ollama vs vllm ollama vs gpt4all ollama vs llama-index ollama vs localai open-webui vs gpt4all llama-cpp vs vllm

More AI Development Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Development Platforms field.

LightRAG vs Dify LightRAG vs langchain LightRAG vs ponytail LightRAG vs generative-ai-for-beginners LightRAG vs graphify LightRAG vs claude-mem LightRAG vs ragflow LightRAG vs PaddleOCR LightRAG vs Agent-Reach LightRAG vs headroom LightRAG vs Mem0 LightRAG vs daily_stock_analysis

Frequently asked questions

Is LightRAG or neo4j more popular?

LightRAG has 39,738 GitHub stars and neo4j has 17,241. LightRAG has the larger community by that measure.

Are LightRAG and neo4j free?

Both are open source. LightRAG is licensed under MIT and neo4j under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between LightRAG and neo4j?

LightRAG is written in Python and neo4j in Java. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, LightRAG or neo4j?

Choose LightRAG if you want the larger community (39,738 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose neo4j if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.