head to head · open source

Lightpanda vs trustgraph

Lightpanda has 35,409 GitHub stars, 1,680 forks, 98 open issues and last shipped yesterday. trustgraph has 2,728 stars, 320 forks, 18 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Lightpanda leads on adoption by 1,198% (35,409 vs 2,728 stars). Lightpanda is written in Zig under AGPL-3.0; trustgraph is written in Python under Apache-2.0. Lightpanda has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, trustgraph 12%. Lightpanda was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Lightpanda ★ 35K trustgraph ★ 2.7K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Lightpanda trustgraph
GitHub stars ★ 35K ★ 2.7K
License AGPL-3.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Zig Python
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-16
Forks ⑂ 1.7K ⑂ 320
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Lightpanda if

  • You weight community size — 35K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Zig
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Lightpanda profile →

pick trustgraph if

  • You want the trustgraph feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and trustgraph fits your workflow better

full trustgraph profile →

About Lightpanda

Lightpanda is a headless browser built from scratch in Zig, designed specifically for AI agents and automation tasks. It is not a fork of Chromium or WebKit but a new implementation targeting performance and efficiency in automated web interactions. It lives in the browser automation ecosystem, competing with tools like Puppeteer and Playwright that typically rely on Chromium based headless modes.

read the full Lightpanda overview →

About trustgraph

TrustGraph is an open source, Python based context orchestration layer that turns raw enterprise data into a unified semantic context layer using hypergraphs, built for teams creating agentic AI applications that need deterministic outcomes and cryptographically verifiable agent behavior.

read the full trustgraph overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K Browser Use ★ 115K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K

Related comparisons

n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs browser-use n8n vs frigate n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces n8n vs skyvern n8n vs automa n8n vs livekit n8n vs obs-studio n8n vs sharex n8n vs kap excalidraw vs obs-studio n8n vs snapify excalidraw vs sharex excalidraw vs kap excalidraw vs snapify n8n vs mole n8n vs pearcleaner n8n vs bleachbit excalidraw vs mole rustdesk vs mole excalidraw vs pearcleaner excalidraw vs bleachbit rustdesk vs pearcleaner

More Automation projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Automation field.

Lightpanda vs n8n Lightpanda vs Browser Use Lightpanda vs frigate Lightpanda vs ProxmoxVE Lightpanda vs ActivePieces Lightpanda vs Skyvern Lightpanda vs Automa Lightpanda vs LiveKit Lightpanda vs amis Lightpanda vs Windmill Lightpanda vs Botpress Lightpanda vs mitosis

Frequently asked questions

Is Lightpanda or trustgraph more popular?

Lightpanda has 35,409 GitHub stars and trustgraph has 2,728. Lightpanda has the larger community by that measure.

Are Lightpanda and trustgraph free?

Both are open source. Lightpanda is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and trustgraph under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Lightpanda and trustgraph?

Lightpanda is written in Zig and trustgraph in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Lightpanda or trustgraph?

Choose Lightpanda if you want the larger community (35,409 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose trustgraph if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.