head to head · open source
Lightpanda vs jshookmcp
Lightpanda has 42,025 GitHub stars, 2,110 forks, 98 open issues and last shipped today. jshookmcp has 2,113 stars, 465 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped today. Lightpanda leads on adoption by 1,889% (42,025 vs 2,113 stars). Lightpanda is written in Zig under AGPL-3.0; jshookmcp is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0. Lightpanda has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, jshookmcp 22%. Lightpanda was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (browser-automation), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Lightpanda | jshookmcp | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 42K | ★ 2.1K |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Written in | Zig | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-14 | 2026-11-14 |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.1K | ⑂ 465 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Lightpanda if
- You weight community size — 42K stars and counting
- You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Zig
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick jshookmcp if
- You want the jshookmcp feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and jshookmcp fits your workflow better
About Lightpanda
Lightpanda Browser The headless browser built from scratch for AI agents and automation. Not a Chromium fork. Not a WebKit patch. A new browser, written in Zig.   Benchmarks Requesting 933 real web pages over the network on a AWS EC2 m5.large instance. See benchmark details. Quick start Install Package Managers Latest nightly from Homebrew: Latest nightly from Arch Linux User Repository: Download from the nightly builds You can download the last binary from the nightly builds for Linux and MacOS for both x86 64 and aarch64. For Linux Verify the binary before running anything: Linux aarch64 is also available…
read the full Lightpanda overview →
About jshookmcp
@jshookmcp/jshook A search first, profile aware reverse engineering workspace for AI agents. Hook the page, capture the network, deobfuscate the bundle, disassemble the WASM, instrument the process — and let one MCP server keep the whole attack surface in reach without drowning the model in schemas. English · 中文 What's different · Capabilities · Use cases · Highlights · Transport · Registry · Architecture · Build Documentation · Getting Started · Configuration · Tool Reference Sponsored by Swiftproxy — Premium Residential Proxies for Web Automation · 10% off code: PROXY90 What makes jshook different Most MCP…
read the full jshookmcp overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Lightpanda or jshookmcp more popular?
Lightpanda has 42,025 GitHub stars and jshookmcp has 2,113. Lightpanda has the larger community by that measure.
Are Lightpanda and jshookmcp free?
Both are open source. Lightpanda is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and jshookmcp under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Lightpanda and jshookmcp?
Lightpanda is written in Zig and jshookmcp in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Lightpanda or jshookmcp?
Choose Lightpanda if you want the larger community (42,025 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose jshookmcp if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.