head to head · open source

Lightpanda vs camofox-browser

Lightpanda has 35,452 GitHub stars, 1,684 forks, 98 open issues and last shipped today. camofox-browser has 11,105 stars, 1,098 forks, 66 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Lightpanda leads on adoption by 219% (35,452 vs 11,105 stars). Lightpanda is written in Zig under AGPL-3.0; camofox-browser is written in JavaScript under MIT. Lightpanda has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, camofox-browser 10%. Lightpanda was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 3 topic tags (browser-automation, playwright, puppeteer), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Lightpanda ★ 35K camofox-browser ★ 11K category Data & Analytics

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Lightpanda camofox-browser
GitHub stars ★ 35K ★ 11K
License AGPL-3.0 MIT
Written in Zig JavaScript
Last push 2026-09-20 2026-09-19
Forks ⑂ 1.7K ⑂ 1.1K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Lightpanda if

  • You weight community size — 35K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Zig
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Lightpanda profile →

pick camofox-browser if

  • You want the camofox-browser feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and camofox-browser fits your workflow better

full camofox-browser profile →

About Lightpanda

Lightpanda is a headless browser built from scratch in Zig, designed specifically for AI agents and automation tasks. It is not a fork of Chromium or WebKit but a new implementation targeting performance and efficiency in automated web interactions. It lives in the browser automation ecosystem, competing with tools like Puppeteer and Playwright that typically rely on Chromium based headless modes.

read the full Lightpanda overview →

About camofox-browser

camofox browser is an anti detection browser server for AI agents, built in JavaScript and distributed under the MIT license. It wraps Camoufox, a Firefox fork that performs fingerprint spoofing at the C++ implementation level, and exposes that engine through a REST API designed for programmatic agents rather than human users. The project lives in the Node.js ecosystem and is published by the team behind jo, a personal AI agent. It is positioned as a drop in replacement for Puppeteer and Playwright when those tools are blocked.

read the full camofox-browser overview →

More in Data & Analytics

Browser Use ★ 115K Mermaid ★ 90K Crawl4AI ★ 84K Scrapling ★ 82K Apache Superset ★ 75K echarts ★ 67K

Related comparisons

firecrawl vs scrapy firecrawl vs crawlee browser-use vs crawl4ai browser-use vs scrapling playwright vs crawl4ai browser-use vs scrapy playwright vs scrapling crawl4ai vs scrapling godot vs pixijs mermaid vs apache-superset three-js vs pixijs supabase vs metabase mermaid vs echarts grafana vs apache-superset apache-superset vs echarts mermaid vs metabase mermaid vs clickhouse crawl4ai vs clickhouse scrapling vs clickhouse apache-superset vs clickhouse mermaid vs apache-pinot clickhouse vs duckdb crawl4ai vs apache-pinot scrapling vs apache-pinot

More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.

Lightpanda vs Browser Use Lightpanda vs Crawl4AI Lightpanda vs Scrapling Lightpanda vs scrapy Lightpanda vs EasySpider Lightpanda vs changedetection.io Lightpanda vs lux Lightpanda vs CloakBrowser Lightpanda vs Scrapegraph-ai Lightpanda vs crawlee Lightpanda vs colly Lightpanda vs stagehand

Frequently asked questions

Is Lightpanda or camofox-browser more popular?

Lightpanda has 35,452 GitHub stars and camofox-browser has 11,105. Lightpanda has the larger community by that measure.

Are Lightpanda and camofox-browser free?

Both are open source. Lightpanda is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and camofox-browser under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Lightpanda and camofox-browser?

Lightpanda is written in Zig and camofox-browser in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Lightpanda or camofox-browser?

Choose Lightpanda if you want the larger community (35,452 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose camofox-browser if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.