head to head · open source
LibreChat vs claude-chat-exporter
LibreChat has 46,754 GitHub stars, 9,616 forks, 732 open issues and last shipped today. claude-chat-exporter has 743 stars, 85 forks, 1 open issues and last shipped 13 days ago. LibreChat leads on adoption by 6,193% (46,754 vs 743 stars). LibreChat is written in TypeScript under MIT; claude-chat-exporter is written in JavaScript under MIT. LibreChat has attracted 21% as many forks as stars, claude-chat-exporter 11%. LibreChat was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (anthropic, claude), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| LibreChat | claude-chat-exporter | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 47K | ★ 743 |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | JavaScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-05 | 2026-10-23 |
| Forks | ⑂ 9.6K | ⑂ 85 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick LibreChat if
- You weight community size — 47K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick claude-chat-exporter if
- You want the claude-chat-exporter feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You evaluated both and claude-chat-exporter fits your workflow better
About LibreChat
LibreChat English · 中文 🚀 What's New in v0.8.8 rc2 Agent run control: Interrupt an Agent before visible answer text, steer runs with files and quoted excerpts, durably queue follow ups, and recover saved partial work with Keep going or Answer now . Agent activity: Optional generated labels group reasoning and tool work, fold completed groups into live phase cards, keep generated files visible, summarize multi step phases, and show the current reasoning direction. Human in the loop Agents: Stream up to four related questions, pause for input or tool approval, and resume durably. Unified Agent Builder: Configure…
read the full LibreChat overview →
About claude-chat-exporter
Claude Chat Exporter A privacy first tool that exports your Claude.ai conversations to clean Markdown. It runs entirely in your browser — no server of its own, nothing uploaded, no tracking. Everything comes through — tables, math and code at full fidelity, plus artifacts, created files, charts and attachments — all read directly from Claude's own API. Exports carry YAML frontmatter with one heading per turn, so they drop straight into an Obsidian vault or a RAG pipeline. Claude's internal API changes without notice, and someone has to keep up. Sponsoring this project is what keeps it maintained. More → ⚡ One…
read the full claude-chat-exporter overview →
More in AI & Machine Learning
Related comparisons
More AI Interaction & Interfaces projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Interaction & Interfaces field.
Frequently asked questions
Is LibreChat or claude-chat-exporter more popular?
LibreChat has 46,754 GitHub stars and claude-chat-exporter has 743. LibreChat has the larger community by that measure.
Are LibreChat and claude-chat-exporter free?
Both are open source. LibreChat is licensed under MIT and claude-chat-exporter under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between LibreChat and claude-chat-exporter?
LibreChat is written in TypeScript and claude-chat-exporter in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, LibreChat or claude-chat-exporter?
Choose LibreChat if you want the larger community (46,754 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose claude-chat-exporter if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.