head to head · open source
lean-ctx vs NeuroSploit
lean-ctx has 3,898 GitHub stars, 355 forks, 9 open issues and last shipped yesterday. NeuroSploit has 1,477 stars, 351 forks, 2 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. lean-ctx leads on adoption by 164% (3,898 vs 1,477 stars). lean-ctx is written in Rust under Apache-2.0; NeuroSploit is written in Rust under MIT. lean-ctx has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, NeuroSploit 24%. lean-ctx was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (ai-agents, ai-security), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| lean-ctx | NeuroSploit | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 3.9K | ★ 1.5K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Written in | Rust | Rust |
| Last push | 2026-10-22 | 2026-10-19 |
| Forks | ⑂ 355 | ⑂ 351 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick lean-ctx if
- You weight community size — 3.9K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Rust
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick NeuroSploit if
- You want the NeuroSploit feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Rust
- You evaluated both and NeuroSploit fits your workflow better
About lean-ctx
██╗ ███████╗ █████╗ ███╗ ██╗ ██████╗████████╗██╗ ██╗ ██║ ██╔════╝██╔══██╗████╗ ██║ ██╔════╝╚══██╔══╝╚██╗██╔╝ ██║ █████╗ ███████║██╔██╗ ██║ ██║ ██║ ╚███╔╝ ██║ ██╔══╝ ██╔══██║██║╚██╗██║ ██║ ██║ ██╔██╗ ███████╗███████╗██║ ██║██║ ╚████║ ╚██████╗ ██║ ██╔╝ ██╗ ╚══════╝╚══════╝╚═╝ ╚═╝╚═╝ ╚═══╝ ╚═════╝ ╚═╝ ╚═╝ ╚═╝ LeanCTX Context Gateway for AI Systems. Control what your AI can see. LeanCTX sits between AI tools and the information they read. It selects task relevant context, applies supported access and content controls before delivery, and records the context operations and delivery evidence it can observe. Your…
read the full lean-ctx overview →
About NeuroSploit
🧠 NeuroSploit v4.4.0 Autonomous, multi model penetration testing harness — Rust, CLI first. by Joas A Santos & Red Team Leaders What is NeuroSploit? NeuroSploit is an autonomous penetration testing tool. You point it at a target; it does the security assessment on its own and hands you a report — recon, exploitation, chaining findings into real impact, and validation, with no human driving each step. The key idea: the harness is the pentester, not the model. Instead of asking one LLM to "hack this", a Rust engine runs the methodology — it picks the right specialist agents for what it finds, runs them in…
read the full NeuroSploit overview →
More in AI & Machine Learning
Related comparisons
More AI Security & Privacy projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Security & Privacy field.
Frequently asked questions
Is lean-ctx or NeuroSploit more popular?
lean-ctx has 3,898 GitHub stars and NeuroSploit has 1,477. lean-ctx has the larger community by that measure.
Are lean-ctx and NeuroSploit free?
Both are open source. lean-ctx is licensed under Apache-2.0 and NeuroSploit under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between lean-ctx and NeuroSploit?
lean-ctx is written in Rust and NeuroSploit in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, lean-ctx or NeuroSploit?
Choose lean-ctx if you want the larger community (3,898 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose NeuroSploit if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.