head to head · open source

Langflow vs lapce

Langflow has 154,983 GitHub stars, 10,113 forks, 1,056 open issues and last shipped yesterday. lapce has 38,860 stars, 1,331 forks, 901 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Langflow leads on adoption by 299% (154,983 vs 38,860 stars). Langflow is written in Python under MIT; lapce is written in Rust under Apache-2.0. Langflow has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, lapce 3%. Langflow was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Langflow ★ 155K lapce ★ 39K category Developer Tools

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

Langflow lapce
GitHub stars ★ 155K ★ 39K
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in Python Rust
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 10K ⑂ 1.3K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Langflow if

  • You weight community size — 155K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Langflow profile →

pick lapce if

  • You want the lapce feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You evaluated both and lapce fits your workflow better

full lapce profile →

About Langflow

Langflow is a visual builder platform for designing, testing, and deploying AI agents and retrieval augmented generation (RAG) pipelines. It lives in the Python based generative AI ecosystem and targets developers building intelligent applications. The project provides a low code interface to assemble components—such as LLMs, vector stores, memory modules, and tools—into executable workflows, while also exposing those workflows as APIs or MCP servers for integration into external applications.

read the full Langflow overview →

About lapce

Lapce is an Apache 2.0 licensed, native graphical code editor written in pure Rust for developers who want fast text editing, built in language intelligence, Vim style modal editing, and remote development support inside one application rather than assembled from a base editor plus a stack of extensions.

read the full lapce overview →

More in Developer Tools

ECC ★ 262K react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 208K vscode ★ 193K Supabase ★ 110K pi ★ 107K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs langflow react vs langflow n8n vs langflow langflow vs langchain react vs supabase react vs pocketbase react vs tooljet react vs appsmith openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip react vs vscode react vs neovim react vs zed opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed vscode vs neovim vscode vs zed react vs kilocode

More Frameworks & Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Frameworks & Platforms field.

Langflow vs ECC Langflow vs react Langflow vs Supabase Langflow vs puppeteer Langflow vs archify Langflow vs PocketBase Langflow vs ToolJet Langflow vs AppSmith Langflow vs it-tools Langflow vs herdr Langflow vs TipTap Langflow vs Directus

Frequently asked questions

Is Langflow or lapce more popular?

Langflow has 154,983 GitHub stars and lapce has 38,860. Langflow has the larger community by that measure.

Are Langflow and lapce free?

Both are open source. Langflow is licensed under MIT and lapce under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Langflow and lapce?

Langflow is written in Python and lapce in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Langflow or lapce?

Choose Langflow if you want the larger community (154,983 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose lapce if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.