head to head · open source

Langflow vs gojq

Langflow has 155,023 GitHub stars, 10,119 forks, 1,056 open issues and last shipped today. gojq has 3,804 stars, 154 forks, 18 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Langflow leads on adoption by 3,975% (155,023 vs 3,804 stars). Langflow is written in Python under MIT; gojq is written in Go under MIT. Langflow has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, gojq 4%. Langflow was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Langflow ★ 155K gojq ★ 3.8K category Developer Tools

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

Langflow gojq
GitHub stars ★ 155K ★ 3.8K
License MIT MIT
Written in Python Go
Last push 2026-09-20 2026-09-19
Forks ⑂ 10K ⑂ 154
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Langflow if

  • You weight community size — 155K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Langflow profile →

pick gojq if

  • You want the gojq feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and gojq fits your workflow better

full gojq profile →

About Langflow

Langflow is a visual builder platform for designing, testing, and deploying AI agents and retrieval augmented generation (RAG) pipelines. It lives in the Python based generative AI ecosystem and targets developers building intelligent applications. The project provides a low code interface to assemble components—such as LLMs, vector stores, memory modules, and tools—into executable workflows, while also exposing those workflows as APIs or MCP servers for integration into external applications.

read the full Langflow overview →

About gojq

gojq is a pure Go implementation of the jq command line JSON processor, built for Go developers and shell users who want jq's query language without jq's C dependencies.

read the full gojq overview →

More in Developer Tools

ECC ★ 263K react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 209K vscode ★ 193K Supabase ★ 110K pi ★ 107K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs langflow react vs langflow n8n vs langflow langflow vs langchain react vs supabase react vs pocketbase react vs tooljet react vs appsmith openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip react vs vscode react vs neovim react vs zed opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed vscode vs neovim vscode vs zed react vs kilocode

More Frameworks & Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Frameworks & Platforms field.

Langflow vs ECC Langflow vs react Langflow vs Supabase Langflow vs puppeteer Langflow vs archify Langflow vs PocketBase Langflow vs i-have-adhd Langflow vs codebase-memory-mcp Langflow vs ToolJet Langflow vs AppSmith Langflow vs it-tools Langflow vs herdr

Frequently asked questions

Is Langflow or gojq more popular?

Langflow has 155,023 GitHub stars and gojq has 3,804. Langflow has the larger community by that measure.

Are Langflow and gojq free?

Both are open source. Langflow is licensed under MIT and gojq under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Langflow and gojq?

Langflow is written in Python and gojq in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Langflow or gojq?

Choose Langflow if you want the larger community (155,023 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose gojq if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.