head to head · open source

Langflow vs CodeEdit

Langflow has 154,943 GitHub stars, 10,108 forks, 1,056 open issues and last shipped yesterday. CodeEdit has 23,033 stars, 1,193 forks, 213 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. Langflow leads on adoption by 573% (154,943 vs 23,033 stars). Langflow is written in Python under MIT; CodeEdit is written in Swift under MIT. Langflow has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, CodeEdit 5%. Langflow was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Langflow ★ 155K CodeEdit ★ 23K category Developer Tools

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Langflow CodeEdit
GitHub stars ★ 155K ★ 23K
License MIT MIT
Written in Python Swift
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-08-18
Forks ⑂ 10K ⑂ 1.2K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Langflow if

  • You weight community size — 155K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Langflow profile →

pick CodeEdit if

  • You want the CodeEdit feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Swift
  • You evaluated both and CodeEdit fits your workflow better

full CodeEdit profile →

About Langflow

Langflow is a visual builder platform for designing, testing, and deploying AI agents and retrieval augmented generation (RAG) pipelines. It lives in the Python based generative AI ecosystem and targets developers building intelligent applications. The project provides a low code interface to assemble components—such as LLMs, vector stores, memory modules, and tools—into executable workflows, while also exposing those workflows as APIs or MCP servers for integration into external applications.

read the full Langflow overview →

About CodeEdit

CodeEdit is a code editor for macOS. It is written in Swift, released under the MIT license, and described as a community project. The GitHub description says the app is open source and free forever. The project aims to provide a native editing experience for developers who work on software outside Apple platform projects.

read the full CodeEdit overview →

More in Developer Tools

OpenCode ★ 208K Supabase ★ 110K pi ★ 107K fastapi ★ 102K Neovim ★ 102K Zed ★ 90K

Related comparisons

langflow vs neovim langflow vs zed opencode vs codeedit langflow vs kilocode langflow vs supabase langflow vs pocketbase langflow vs tooljet langflow vs appsmith langflow vs tiptap langflow vs directus langflow vs budibase langflow vs onlook langflow vs hercules langflow vs argos opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed opencode vs kilocode neovim vs zed opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip opencode vs orca opencode vs cline opencode vs aider

More Frameworks & Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Frameworks & Platforms field.

Langflow vs Supabase Langflow vs PocketBase Langflow vs ToolJet Langflow vs AppSmith Langflow vs TipTap Langflow vs Directus Langflow vs Budibase Langflow vs Onlook Langflow vs Teable Langflow vs Convex Langflow vs Alokai Langflow vs KeystoneJS

Frequently asked questions

Is Langflow or CodeEdit more popular?

Langflow has 154,943 GitHub stars and CodeEdit has 23,033. Langflow has the larger community by that measure.

Are Langflow and CodeEdit free?

Both are open source. Langflow is licensed under MIT and CodeEdit under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Langflow and CodeEdit?

Langflow is written in Python and CodeEdit in Swift. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Langflow or CodeEdit?

Choose Langflow if you want the larger community (154,943 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose CodeEdit if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.