head to head · open source

langchain vs feynman

langchain has 147,021 GitHub stars, 24,603 forks, 492 open issues and last shipped yesterday. feynman has 9,781 stars, 1,087 forks, 1 open issues and last shipped today. langchain leads on adoption by 1,403% (147,021 vs 9,781 stars). langchain is written in Python under MIT; feynman is written in TypeScript under MIT. langchain has attracted 17% as many forks as stars, feynman 11%. feynman was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

langchain ★ 147K feynman ★ 9.8K category AI & Machine Learning

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

langchain feynman
GitHub stars ★ 147K ★ 9.8K
License MIT MIT
Written in Python TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-24 2026-09-25
Forks ⑂ 25K ⑂ 1.1K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick langchain if

  • You weight community size — 147K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full langchain profile →

pick feynman if

  • You want the feynman feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and feynman fits your workflow better

full feynman profile →

About langchain

LangChain is an open source framework for building agents and LLM powered applications, written in Python and released under the MIT license. It lives in the AI and machine learning ecosystem, specifically among AI development platforms, and it works by chaining together interoperable components and third party integrations so that AI application development becomes simpler. The project describes itself as the agent engineering platform, and its abstractions are designed to keep applications working as the underlying technology evolves.

read the full langchain overview →

About feynman

Feynman is the open source AI research agent: an MIT licensed TypeScript command line tool that searches papers and the web and answers with cited sources, aimed at researchers, engineers, and research groups.

read the full feynman overview →

More in AI & Machine Learning

OpenClaw ★ 390K Hermes Agent ★ 249K Ollama ★ 182K Dify ★ 157K Open WebUI ★ 153K ponytail ★ 146K

Related comparisons

dify vs langchain openclaw vs dify openclaw vs multica openclaw vs langgraph n8n vs dify dify vs langflow dify vs open-webui dify vs ponytail openclaw vs hermes-agent openclaw vs opencode openclaw vs n8n openclaw vs open-webui openclaw vs comfyui openclaw vs odysseus openclaw vs lobechat openclaw vs anythingllm openclaw vs ollama ollama vs llama-cpp ollama vs vllm ollama vs odysseus ollama vs gpt4all ollama vs llama-index ollama vs localai open-webui vs gpt4all

More AI Development Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Development Platforms field.

langchain vs Dify langchain vs ponytail langchain vs graphify langchain vs generative-ai-for-beginners langchain vs claude-mem langchain vs ragflow langchain vs PaddleOCR langchain vs Agent-Reach langchain vs headroom langchain vs Mem0 langchain vs daily_stock_analysis langchain vs LiteLLM

Frequently asked questions

Is langchain or feynman more popular?

langchain has 147,021 GitHub stars and feynman has 9,781. langchain has the larger community by that measure.

Are langchain and feynman free?

Both are open source. langchain is licensed under MIT and feynman under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between langchain and feynman?

langchain is written in Python and feynman in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, langchain or feynman?

Choose langchain if you want the larger community (147,021 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose feynman if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.