head to head · open source

Lago vs Expensify

Lago has 10,568 GitHub stars, 750 forks, 23 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Expensify has 5,025 stars, 4,010 forks, 2,252 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Lago leads on adoption by 110% (10,568 vs 5,025 stars). Lago is written in Go under AGPL-3.0; Expensify is written in TypeScript under MIT. Lago has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, Expensify 80%. Expensify was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Lago ★ 11K Expensify ★ 5.0K category Business Software

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Lago Expensify
GitHub stars ★ 11K ★ 5.0K
License AGPL-3.0 MIT
Written in Go TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 750 ⑂ 4.0K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Lago if

  • You weight community size — 11K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Lago profile →

pick Expensify if

  • You want the Expensify feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and Expensify fits your workflow better

full Expensify profile →

About Lago

Lago is an open source metering and usage based billing API written in Go under AGPL 3.0. It lives in the Business Software and Finance & Accounting ecosystem and sits between product usage and revenue. It turns events such as AI tokens, compute, API calls, seats, and custom events into billable metrics, pricing, credits, entitlements, invoices, and payments.

read the full Lago overview →

About Expensify

Expensify (New Expensify) is a chat centered financial collaboration application built in TypeScript and published under the MIT license, aimed at developers and contributors who build and extend expense management workflows across web, iOS, and Android.

read the full Expensify overview →

More in Business Software

Plane ★ 60K Twenty ★ 57K Odoo ★ 54K Cal.com ★ 49K Rocket.Chat ★ 46K cobalt ★ 43K

Related comparisons

erpnext vs lago erpnext vs midday erpnext vs aureuserp erpnext vs polar erpnext vs akaunting erpnext vs invoice-ninja erpnext vs idurar-erp-crm erpnext vs taxhacker plane vs rocket-chat plane vs cobalt plane vs buzz rocket-chat vs cobalt plane vs jitsi plane vs srs plane vs huly plane vs zulip plane vs anki twenty vs anki odoo vs anki cal-com vs anki plane vs tutor twenty vs tutor odoo vs tutor cal-com vs tutor

More Finance & Accounting projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Finance & Accounting field.

Lago vs ERPNext Lago vs Midday Lago vs aureuserp Lago vs Polar Lago vs Akaunting Lago vs Invoice Ninja Lago vs idurar-erp-crm Lago vs TaxHacker Lago vs Frappe Books Lago vs hledger Lago vs personal-management-system Lago vs rotki

Frequently asked questions

Is Lago or Expensify more popular?

Lago has 10,568 GitHub stars and Expensify has 5,025. Lago has the larger community by that measure.

Are Lago and Expensify free?

Both are open source. Lago is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Expensify under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Lago and Expensify?

Lago is written in Go and Expensify in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Lago or Expensify?

Choose Lago if you want the larger community (10,568 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Expensify if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.