head to head · open source

Keycloak vs pwd.sh

Keycloak has 36,920 GitHub stars, 8,950 forks, 3,292 open issues and last shipped today. pwd.sh has 1,563 stars, 136 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped 29 days ago. Keycloak leads on adoption by 2,262% (36,920 vs 1,563 stars). Keycloak is written in Java under Apache-2.0; pwd.sh is written in Shell under MIT. Keycloak has attracted 24% as many forks as stars, pwd.sh 9%. Keycloak was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Keycloak ★ 37K pwd.sh ★ 1.6K category Security & Privacy

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Keycloak pwd.sh
GitHub stars ★ 37K ★ 1.6K
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in Java Shell
Last push 2026-09-22 2026-08-24
Forks ⑂ 8.9K ⑂ 136
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Keycloak if

  • You weight community size — 37K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Keycloak profile →

pick pwd.sh if

  • You want the pwd.sh feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Shell
  • You evaluated both and pwd.sh fits your workflow better

full pwd.sh profile →

About Keycloak

Keycloak is an open source identity and access management server, written in Java and licensed under Apache 2.0, that adds authentication and access control to applications and services, and it is intended for teams and organisations that want to own their user store rather than rent one.

read the full Keycloak overview →

About pwd.sh

pwd.sh is a Bash script that manages text secrets such as passwords by storing each one in a GnuPG symmetric encrypted file, and it is for people who work in a terminal and prefer to keep their own encrypted store rather than hand it to a hosted password service.

read the full pwd.sh overview →

More in Security & Privacy

PayloadsAllTheThings ★ 81K Puter ★ 44K Mattermost ★ 39K Tailscale ★ 37K HashiCorp Vault ★ 36K Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills ★ 33K

Related comparisons

keycloak vs jumpserver keycloak vs better-auth keycloak vs authelia keycloak vs authentik keycloak vs vault keycloak vs tirreno supabase vs better-auth jumpserver vs better-auth jumpserver vs authelia better-auth vs authelia payloadsallthethings vs vault vaultwarden vs vault payloadsallthethings vs unkey payloadsallthethings vs phase payloadsallthethings vs keyshade puter vs vault mattermost vs vault payloadsallthethings vs anthropic-cybersecurity-skills payloadsallthethings vs projectdiscovery payloadsallthethings vs pentagi payloadsallthethings vs pentestgpt payloadsallthethings vs osintgram payloadsallthethings vs vuls payloadsallthethings vs osv-scanner

More Identity & Access Management (IAM) projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Identity & Access Management (IAM) field.

Keycloak vs JumpServer Keycloak vs Better Auth Keycloak vs authelia Keycloak vs Authentik Keycloak vs casbin Keycloak vs Sa-Token Keycloak vs hydra Keycloak vs SuperTokens Keycloak vs Zitadel Keycloak vs oauth2-proxy Keycloak vs Logto Keycloak vs casdoor

Frequently asked questions

Is Keycloak or pwd.sh more popular?

Keycloak has 36,920 GitHub stars and pwd.sh has 1,563. Keycloak has the larger community by that measure.

Are Keycloak and pwd.sh free?

Both are open source. Keycloak is licensed under Apache-2.0 and pwd.sh under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Keycloak and pwd.sh?

Keycloak is written in Java and pwd.sh in Shell. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Keycloak or pwd.sh?

Choose Keycloak if you want the larger community (36,920 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose pwd.sh if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.