head to head · open source

Keycloak vs KeePassDX

Keycloak has 36,855 GitHub stars, 8,942 forks, 3,292 open issues and last shipped yesterday. KeePassDX has 7,332 stars, 403 forks, 541 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. Keycloak leads on adoption by 403% (36,855 vs 7,332 stars). Keycloak is written in Java under Apache-2.0; KeePassDX is written in Kotlin under GPL-3.0. Keycloak has attracted 24% as many forks as stars, KeePassDX 5%. Keycloak was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Keycloak ★ 37K KeePassDX ★ 7.3K category Security & Privacy

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

Keycloak KeePassDX
GitHub stars ★ 37K ★ 7.3K
License Apache-2.0 GPL-3.0
Written in Java Kotlin
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-15
Forks ⑂ 8.9K ⑂ 403
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Keycloak if

  • You weight community size — 37K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Keycloak profile →

pick KeePassDX if

  • You want the KeePassDX feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Kotlin
  • You evaluated both and KeePassDX fits your workflow better

full KeePassDX profile →

About Keycloak

Keycloak is an open source identity and access management server, written in Java and licensed under Apache 2.0, that adds authentication and access control to applications and services, and it is intended for teams and organisations that want to own their user store rather than rent one.

read the full Keycloak overview →

About KeePassDX

KeePassDX is a free, open source and ad free password and passkey manager for Android that keeps credentials in a single encrypted local database file in KeePass format and fills login forms through autofill and its own keyboard.

read the full KeePassDX overview →

More in Security & Privacy

PayloadsAllTheThings ★ 81K Puter ★ 44K Mattermost ★ 39K Tailscale ★ 37K HashiCorp Vault ★ 36K Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills ★ 33K

Related comparisons

keycloak vs jumpserver keycloak vs better-auth keycloak vs authentik keycloak vs vault keycloak vs projectdiscovery keycloak vs tracecat keycloak vs tirreno keycloak vs marble supabase vs better-auth jumpserver vs better-auth jumpserver vs authentik better-auth vs authentik jumpserver vs teleport puter vs mattermost mattermost vs nextcloud puter vs signal puter vs ente mattermost vs signal mattermost vs ente mattermost vs zulip signal vs ente puter vs vault mattermost vs vault vault vs infisical

More Identity & Access Management (IAM) projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Identity & Access Management (IAM) field.

Keycloak vs JumpServer Keycloak vs Better Auth Keycloak vs authelia Keycloak vs Authentik Keycloak vs casbin Keycloak vs Sa-Token Keycloak vs hydra Keycloak vs SuperTokens Keycloak vs Zitadel Keycloak vs Logto Keycloak vs Ory Keycloak vs cas

Frequently asked questions

Is Keycloak or KeePassDX more popular?

Keycloak has 36,855 GitHub stars and KeePassDX has 7,332. Keycloak has the larger community by that measure.

Are Keycloak and KeePassDX free?

Both are open source. Keycloak is licensed under Apache-2.0 and KeePassDX under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Keycloak and KeePassDX?

Keycloak is written in Java and KeePassDX in Kotlin. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Keycloak or KeePassDX?

Choose Keycloak if you want the larger community (36,855 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose KeePassDX if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.