head to head · open source

Keycloak vs fido2-net-lib

Keycloak has 36,876 GitHub stars, 8,945 forks, 3,292 open issues and last shipped today. fido2-net-lib has 1,452 stars, 202 forks, 20 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Keycloak leads on adoption by 2,440% (36,876 vs 1,452 stars). Keycloak is written in Java under Apache-2.0; fido2-net-lib is written in C# under MIT. Keycloak has attracted 24% as many forks as stars, fido2-net-lib 14%. Keycloak was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Keycloak ★ 37K fido2-net-lib ★ 1.5K category Security & Privacy

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

Keycloak fido2-net-lib
GitHub stars ★ 37K ★ 1.5K
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in Java C#
Last push 2026-09-20 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 8.9K ⑂ 202
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Keycloak if

  • You weight community size — 37K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Keycloak profile →

pick fido2-net-lib if

  • You want the fido2-net-lib feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches C#
  • You evaluated both and fido2-net-lib fits your workflow better

full fido2-net-lib profile →

About Keycloak

Keycloak is an open source identity and access management server, written in Java and licensed under Apache 2.0, that adds authentication and access control to applications and services, and it is intended for teams and organisations that want to own their user store rather than rent one.

read the full Keycloak overview →

About fido2-net-lib

fido2 net lib is an open source, MIT licensed C library that provides a FIDO2 server and WebAuthn relying party implementation for .NET, aimed at developers who want passkey registration and sign in in ASP.NET Core, .NET Core and native .NET applications without writing the credential validation logic themselves.

read the full fido2-net-lib overview →

More in Security & Privacy

PayloadsAllTheThings ★ 81K Puter ★ 44K Mattermost ★ 39K Tailscale ★ 37K HashiCorp Vault ★ 36K Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills ★ 33K

Related comparisons

keycloak vs jumpserver keycloak vs better-auth keycloak vs authentik keycloak vs vault keycloak vs projectdiscovery keycloak vs tracecat keycloak vs tirreno keycloak vs marble supabase vs better-auth jumpserver vs better-auth jumpserver vs authentik better-auth vs authentik jumpserver vs teleport puter vs mattermost mattermost vs nextcloud puter vs signal puter vs ente mattermost vs signal mattermost vs ente mattermost vs zulip signal vs ente puter vs vault mattermost vs vault vault vs infisical

More Identity & Access Management (IAM) projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Identity & Access Management (IAM) field.

Keycloak vs JumpServer Keycloak vs Better Auth Keycloak vs authelia Keycloak vs Authentik Keycloak vs casbin Keycloak vs Sa-Token Keycloak vs hydra Keycloak vs SuperTokens Keycloak vs Zitadel Keycloak vs oauth2-proxy Keycloak vs Logto Keycloak vs casdoor

Frequently asked questions

Is Keycloak or fido2-net-lib more popular?

Keycloak has 36,876 GitHub stars and fido2-net-lib has 1,452. Keycloak has the larger community by that measure.

Are Keycloak and fido2-net-lib free?

Both are open source. Keycloak is licensed under Apache-2.0 and fido2-net-lib under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Keycloak and fido2-net-lib?

Keycloak is written in Java and fido2-net-lib in C#. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Keycloak or fido2-net-lib?

Choose Keycloak if you want the larger community (36,876 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose fido2-net-lib if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.