head to head · open source

Keycloak vs Authgear

Keycloak has 36,832 GitHub stars, 8,941 forks, 3,292 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Authgear has 2,054 stars, 124 forks, 368 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Keycloak leads on adoption by 1,693% (36,832 vs 2,054 stars). Keycloak is written in Java under Apache-2.0; Authgear is written in Go under Apache-2.0. Keycloak has attracted 24% as many forks as stars, Authgear 6%. Keycloak was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (keycloak), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Keycloak ★ 37K Authgear ★ 2.1K category Security & Privacy

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Keycloak Authgear
GitHub stars ★ 37K ★ 2.1K
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Java Go
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 8.9K ⑂ 124
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Keycloak if

  • You weight community size — 37K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Keycloak profile →

pick Authgear if

  • You want the Authgear feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and Authgear fits your workflow better

full Authgear profile →

About Keycloak

Keycloak is an open source identity and access management server, written in Java and licensed under Apache 2.0, that adds authentication and access control to applications and services, and it is intended for teams and organisations that want to own their user store rather than rent one.

read the full Keycloak overview →

About Authgear

Authgear is open source identity and access management platform. It is managed identity platform for any app. It is open source Auth0, Clerk, Firebase Auth alternative. It is written in Go, licensed Apache 2.0, and lives in identity and access management ecosystem.

read the full Authgear overview →

More in Security & Privacy

Puter ★ 44K Mattermost ★ 39K Tailscale ★ 37K HashiCorp Vault ★ 36K JumpServer ★ 32K ProjectDiscovery ★ 31K

Related comparisons

keycloak vs jumpserver keycloak vs better-auth keycloak vs authentik keycloak vs supertokens keycloak vs zitadel keycloak vs projectdiscovery keycloak vs tracecat keycloak vs tirreno keycloak vs marble jumpserver vs better-auth jumpserver vs authentik better-auth vs authentik puter vs mattermost puter vs signal puter vs ente mattermost vs signal mattermost vs ente signal vs ente puter vs element puter vs fluxer puter vs vault mattermost vs vault puter vs unkey mattermost vs unkey

More Identity & Access Management (IAM) projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Identity & Access Management (IAM) field.

Keycloak vs JumpServer Keycloak vs Better Auth Keycloak vs Authentik Keycloak vs SuperTokens Keycloak vs Zitadel Keycloak vs Logto Keycloak vs Ory Keycloak vs Hexclave Keycloak vs Permify

Frequently asked questions

Is Keycloak or Authgear more popular?

Keycloak has 36,832 GitHub stars and Authgear has 2,054. Keycloak has the larger community by that measure.

Are Keycloak and Authgear free?

Both are open source. Keycloak is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Authgear under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Keycloak and Authgear?

Keycloak is written in Java and Authgear in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Keycloak or Authgear?

Choose Keycloak if you want the larger community (36,832 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose Authgear if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.