head to head · open source

katana vs SeleniumBase

katana has 17,518 GitHub stars, 1,183 forks, 23 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. SeleniumBase has 13,023 stars, 1,583 forks, 14 open issues and last shipped yesterday. katana leads on adoption by 35% (17,518 vs 13,023 stars). katana is written in Go under MIT; SeleniumBase is written in Python under MIT. katana has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, SeleniumBase 12%. SeleniumBase was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

katana ★ 18K SeleniumBase ★ 13K category Data & Analytics

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

katana SeleniumBase
GitHub stars ★ 18K ★ 13K
License MIT MIT
Written in Go Python
Last push 2026-09-14 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 1.2K ⑂ 1.6K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick katana if

  • You weight community size — 18K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full katana profile →

pick SeleniumBase if

  • You want the SeleniumBase feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and SeleniumBase fits your workflow better

full SeleniumBase profile →

About katana

Katana is an open source, MIT licensed crawling and spidering framework written in Go, built for security engineers and automation pipelines that need to map web applications at scale rather than explore them by hand.

read the full katana overview →

About SeleniumBase

SeleniumBase is an MIT licensed Python framework that combines browser automation, end to end testing, web crawling, scraping, and bot detection bypass in one package, built for QA engineers, test automation developers, and Python scraper authors.

read the full SeleniumBase overview →

More in Data & Analytics

Mermaid ★ 90K Crawl4AI ★ 84K Scrapling ★ 82K Apache Superset ★ 75K echarts ★ 67K scrapy ★ 64K

Related comparisons

crawl4ai vs scrapling crawl4ai vs scrapy scrapling vs scrapy crawl4ai vs easyspider scrapling vs easyspider crawl4ai vs changedetection-io scrapling vs changedetection-io crawl4ai vs lux mermaid vs apache-superset mermaid vs echarts apache-superset vs echarts mermaid vs metabase mermaid vs pixijs mermaid vs diagram-design apache-superset vs metabase apache-superset vs pixijs mermaid vs clickhouse crawl4ai vs clickhouse scrapling vs clickhouse apache-superset vs clickhouse mermaid vs apache-pinot crawl4ai vs apache-pinot scrapling vs apache-pinot apache-superset vs apache-pinot

More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.

katana vs Crawl4AI katana vs Scrapling katana vs scrapy katana vs EasySpider katana vs changedetection.io katana vs lux katana vs CloakBrowser katana vs Scrapegraph-ai katana vs crawlee katana vs colly katana vs stagehand katana vs proxy_pool

Frequently asked questions

Is katana or SeleniumBase more popular?

katana has 17,518 GitHub stars and SeleniumBase has 13,023. katana has the larger community by that measure.

Are katana and SeleniumBase free?

Both are open source. katana is licensed under MIT and SeleniumBase under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between katana and SeleniumBase?

katana is written in Go and SeleniumBase in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, katana or SeleniumBase?

Choose katana if you want the larger community (17,518 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose SeleniumBase if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.