head to head · open source
katana vs SeleniumBase
katana has 17,786 GitHub stars, 1,213 forks, 23 open issues and last shipped yesterday. SeleniumBase has 13,220 stars, 1,610 forks, 14 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. katana leads on adoption by 35% (17,786 vs 13,220 stars). katana is written in Go under MIT; SeleniumBase is written in Python under MIT. katana has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, SeleniumBase 12%. katana was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| katana | SeleniumBase | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 18K | ★ 13K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Go | Python |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-29 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.2K | ⑂ 1.6K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick katana if
- You weight community size — 18K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick SeleniumBase if
- You want the SeleniumBase feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and SeleniumBase fits your workflow better
About katana
A next generation crawling and spidering framework Features • Installation • Usage • Scope • Config • Filters • Join Discord Features Fast And fully configurable web crawling Standard and Headless mode JavaScript parsing / crawling Customizable automatic form filling Scope control Preconfigured field / Regex Knowledge base ML page type / form classification (auto downloaded model) Customizable output Preconfigured fields INPUT STDIN , URL and LIST OUTPUT STDOUT , FILE and JSON Installation katana requires Go 1.26+ to install successfully. If you encounter any installation issues, we recommend trying with the…
read the full katana overview →
About SeleniumBase
All in one Browser Automation Framework: Web Crawling / Testing / Scraping / Stealth 🚀 Start 🏰 Features 🎛️ Options 📚 Examples 💻 Scripts 🗾 Locale 📗 API 📘 Stealth API 🔠 DesignPatterns 🔴 Recorder 📊 Dashboard 🎖️ GUI 📰 TestPage 👤 UC Mode 🐙 CDP Mode 📶 Charts 🖥️ Farm 👁️ How 🚝 Migration 🎭 Stealthy Playwright 🛂 MasterQA 🚎 Tours 🤖 MCP 🟨 JS Mgr 🌏 Translator 🎞️ Presenter 🖼️ Visual 🗂️ CPlans 🐙 CDP Mode bypasses bot detection with Chromium based browsers. 🎭 Stealthy Playwright Mode extends CDP Mode's stealth to Playwright. pip install seleniumbase for the main framework. (Or use uv add ) pip…
read the full SeleniumBase overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is katana or SeleniumBase more popular?
katana has 17,786 GitHub stars and SeleniumBase has 13,220. katana has the larger community by that measure.
Are katana and SeleniumBase free?
Both are open source. katana is licensed under MIT and SeleniumBase under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between katana and SeleniumBase?
katana is written in Go and SeleniumBase in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, katana or SeleniumBase?
Choose katana if you want the larger community (17,786 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose SeleniumBase if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.