head to head · open source

katana vs ruia

katana has 17,579 GitHub stars, 1,188 forks, 23 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. ruia has 1,737 stars, 185 forks, 9 open issues and last shipped 10 days ago. katana leads on adoption by 912% (17,579 vs 1,737 stars). katana is written in Go under MIT; ruia is written in Python under Apache-2.0. katana has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, ruia 11%. katana was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (crawler), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

katana ★ 18K ruia ★ 1.7K category Data & Analytics

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

katana ruia
GitHub stars ★ 18K ★ 1.7K
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in Go Python
Last push 2026-09-25 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 1.2K ⑂ 185
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick katana if

  • You weight community size — 18K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full katana profile →

pick ruia if

  • You want the ruia feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and ruia fits your workflow better

full ruia profile →

About katana

Katana is an open source, MIT licensed crawling and spidering framework written in Go, built for security engineers and automation pipelines that need to map web applications at scale rather than explore them by hand.

read the full katana overview →

About ruia

Ruia is an asynchronous web scraping micro framework for Python 3.6 and above, built on asyncio and aiohttp , and intended for Python developers who want to declare what a crawler should collect and let the framework handle concurrent requests.

read the full ruia overview →

More in Data & Analytics

Browser Use ★ 116K Mermaid ★ 90K Crawl4AI ★ 84K Scrapling ★ 84K Apache Superset ★ 75K echarts ★ 67K

Related comparisons

firecrawl vs scrapy firecrawl vs crawlee browser-use vs crawl4ai browser-use vs scrapling playwright vs crawl4ai browser-use vs scrapy playwright vs scrapling crawl4ai vs scrapling godot vs pixijs mermaid vs apache-superset three-js vs pixijs supabase vs metabase mermaid vs echarts grafana vs apache-superset apache-superset vs echarts mermaid vs metabase mermaid vs clickhouse crawl4ai vs clickhouse scrapling vs clickhouse apache-superset vs clickhouse mermaid vs apache-pinot clickhouse vs duckdb crawl4ai vs apache-pinot scrapling vs apache-pinot

More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.

katana vs Browser Use katana vs Crawl4AI katana vs Scrapling katana vs scrapy katana vs EasySpider katana vs Lightpanda katana vs changedetection.io katana vs CloakBrowser katana vs lux katana vs Scrapegraph-ai katana vs page-agent katana vs ArchiveBox

Frequently asked questions

Is katana or ruia more popular?

katana has 17,579 GitHub stars and ruia has 1,737. katana has the larger community by that measure.

Are katana and ruia free?

Both are open source. katana is licensed under MIT and ruia under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between katana and ruia?

katana is written in Go and ruia in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, katana or ruia?

Choose katana if you want the larger community (17,579 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose ruia if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.