head to head · open source

katana vs crawlab

katana has 17,518 GitHub stars, 1,183 forks, 23 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. crawlab has 12,273 stars, 1,890 forks, 166 open issues and last shipped 7 months ago. katana leads on adoption by 43% (17,518 vs 12,273 stars). katana is written in Go under MIT; crawlab is written in Go under BSD-3-Clause. katana has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, crawlab 15%. katana was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (crawler), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

katana ★ 18K crawlab ★ 12K category Data & Analytics

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

katana crawlab
GitHub stars ★ 18K ★ 12K
License MIT BSD-3-Clause
Written in Go Go
Last push 2026-09-14 2026-02-10
Forks ⑂ 1.2K ⑂ 1.9K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick katana if

  • You weight community size — 18K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full katana profile →

pick crawlab if

  • You want the crawlab feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the BSD-3-Clause license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and crawlab fits your workflow better

full crawlab profile →

About katana

Katana is an open source, MIT licensed crawling and spidering framework written in Go, built for security engineers and automation pipelines that need to map web applications at scale rather than explore them by hand.

read the full katana overview →

About crawlab

Crawlab is a BSD 3 Clause licensed, Go based distributed web crawler admin platform that manages spiders regardless of the language or framework they are written in, built for teams that run many crawlers and need one place to schedule, monitor, and inspect them.

read the full crawlab overview →

More in Data & Analytics

Mermaid ★ 90K Crawl4AI ★ 84K Scrapling ★ 82K Apache Superset ★ 75K echarts ★ 67K scrapy ★ 64K

Related comparisons

crawl4ai vs scrapling crawl4ai vs scrapy scrapling vs scrapy crawl4ai vs easyspider scrapling vs easyspider crawl4ai vs changedetection-io scrapling vs changedetection-io crawl4ai vs lux mermaid vs apache-superset mermaid vs echarts apache-superset vs echarts mermaid vs metabase mermaid vs pixijs mermaid vs diagram-design apache-superset vs metabase apache-superset vs pixijs mermaid vs clickhouse crawl4ai vs clickhouse scrapling vs clickhouse apache-superset vs clickhouse mermaid vs apache-pinot crawl4ai vs apache-pinot scrapling vs apache-pinot apache-superset vs apache-pinot

More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.

katana vs Crawl4AI katana vs Scrapling katana vs scrapy katana vs EasySpider katana vs changedetection.io katana vs lux katana vs CloakBrowser katana vs Scrapegraph-ai katana vs crawlee katana vs colly katana vs stagehand katana vs proxy_pool

Frequently asked questions

Is katana or crawlab more popular?

katana has 17,518 GitHub stars and crawlab has 12,273. katana has the larger community by that measure.

Are katana and crawlab free?

Both are open source. katana is licensed under MIT and crawlab under BSD-3-Clause. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between katana and crawlab?

katana is written in Go and crawlab in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, katana or crawlab?

Choose katana if you want the larger community (17,518 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose crawlab if its feature set, stack or BSD-3-Clause licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.