head to head · open source

KaibanJS vs lotti

KaibanJS has 1,479 GitHub stars, 158 forks, 78 open issues and last shipped 4 months ago. lotti has 1,175 stars, 119 forks, 4 open issues and last shipped today. KaibanJS leads on adoption by 26% (1,479 vs 1,175 stars). KaibanJS is written in TypeScript under MIT; lotti is written in Dart under GPL-3.0. KaibanJS has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, lotti 10%. lotti was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (agentic, ai), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

KaibanJS ★ 1.5K lotti ★ 1.2K category Business Software

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

KaibanJS lotti
GitHub stars ★ 1.5K ★ 1.2K
License MIT GPL-3.0
Written in TypeScript Dart
Last push 2026-05-15 2026-09-20
Forks ⑂ 158 ⑂ 119
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick KaibanJS if

  • You weight community size — 1.5K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full KaibanJS profile →

pick lotti if

  • You want the lotti feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Dart
  • You evaluated both and lotti fits your workflow better

full lotti profile →

About KaibanJS

KaibanJS is an MIT licensed, TypeScript written JavaScript native framework for building and managing multi agent systems with a Kanban inspired approach. It lives in the JavaScript ecosystem and provides a way to create, visualize, and coordinate AI agents, tasks, tools, and teams.

read the full KaibanJS overview →

About lotti

Lotti is an open source, end to end encrypted logbook for individuals who want a private, local first record of the work they actually did, staffed by persistent AI agents that read what is recorded and propose the next change for the user to approve.

read the full lotti overview →

More in Business Software

Plane ★ 60K Twenty ★ 57K Odoo ★ 54K Cal.com ★ 49K Rocket.Chat ★ 46K cobalt ★ 44K

Related comparisons

opencode vs vibe-kanban conductor vs vibe-kanban vibe-kanban vs wekan vibe-kanban vs qinglong vibe-kanban vs edict vibe-kanban vs openproject vibe-kanban vs onedev wekan vs qinglong plane vs rocket-chat plane vs cobalt plane vs buzz rocket-chat vs cobalt plane vs jitsi plane vs srs plane vs huly plane vs zulip odoo vs erpnext odoo vs grocy odoo vs greaterwms odoo vs shelf odoo vs ralph odoo vs part-db-server odoo vs open-mercato odoo vs steedos-platform

More Project & Work Management projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Project & Work Management field.

KaibanJS vs vibe-kanban KaibanJS vs Wekan KaibanJS vs qinglong KaibanJS vs edict KaibanJS vs OpenProject KaibanJS vs onedev KaibanJS vs Planka KaibanJS vs Leantime KaibanJS vs kanboard KaibanJS vs Kaneo KaibanJS vs ccpm KaibanJS vs Fizzy

Frequently asked questions

Is KaibanJS or lotti more popular?

KaibanJS has 1,479 GitHub stars and lotti has 1,175. KaibanJS has the larger community by that measure.

Are KaibanJS and lotti free?

Both are open source. KaibanJS is licensed under MIT and lotti under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between KaibanJS and lotti?

KaibanJS is written in TypeScript and lotti in Dart. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, KaibanJS or lotti?

Choose KaibanJS if you want the larger community (1,479 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose lotti if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.