head to head · open source

jsdoc vs Fumadocs

jsdoc has 15,463 GitHub stars, 1,492 forks, 459 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Fumadocs has 13,171 stars, 730 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped yesterday. jsdoc leads on adoption by 17% (15,463 vs 13,171 stars). jsdoc is written in JavaScript under Apache-2.0; Fumadocs is written in TypeScript under MIT. jsdoc has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, Fumadocs 6%. Fumadocs was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (docs), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

jsdoc ★ 15K Fumadocs ★ 13K category Content & Publishing

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

jsdoc Fumadocs
GitHub stars ★ 15K ★ 13K
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in JavaScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 1.5K ⑂ 730
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick jsdoc if

  • You weight community size — 15K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full jsdoc profile →

pick Fumadocs if

  • You want the Fumadocs feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and Fumadocs fits your workflow better

full Fumadocs profile →

About jsdoc

JSDoc is an API documentation generator for JavaScript that reads annotations in source comments and produces a browsable documentation site, aimed at JavaScript developers and library maintainers who need reference documentation to stay in sync with code.

read the full jsdoc overview →

About Fumadocs

Fumadocs is a documentation framework for React.js and Astro. It is written in TypeScript and released under the MIT license. The project targets documentation websites. It lives in the React.js and Astro documentation ecosystem. The supplied registry category is Content & Publishing / Documentation & Knowledge Base. The supplied repository metadata lists 13,134 stars and 728 forks. The supplied repository age is 0 years, and the last push timestamp is 2026 09 14T12:45:01Z.

read the full Fumadocs overview →

More in Content & Publishing

next.js ★ 142K storybook ★ 91K hugo ★ 90K Understand-Anything ★ 83K Strapi ★ 73K nuxt ★ 61K

Related comparisons

storybook vs understand-anything storybook vs devdocs storybook vs docsify understand-anything vs devdocs storybook vs wiki storybook vs mkdocs-material understand-anything vs docsify understand-anything vs wiki next-js vs nuxt next-js vs gatsby next-js vs ghost next-js vs jekyll next-js vs hexo next-js vs nextra next-js vs kit next-js vs vike hugo vs strapi hugo vs payload hugo vs halo hugo vs filament strapi vs payload strapi vs halo hugo vs wagtail hugo vs decap-cms

More Documentation & Knowledge Base projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Documentation & Knowledge Base field.

jsdoc vs storybook jsdoc vs Understand-Anything jsdoc vs devdocs jsdoc vs docsify jsdoc vs wiki jsdoc vs mkdocs-material jsdoc vs BookStack jsdoc vs deepwiki-open jsdoc vs Docs jsdoc vs Skill_Seekers jsdoc vs gollum jsdoc vs cheat

Frequently asked questions

Is jsdoc or Fumadocs more popular?

jsdoc has 15,463 GitHub stars and Fumadocs has 13,171. jsdoc has the larger community by that measure.

Are jsdoc and Fumadocs free?

Both are open source. jsdoc is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Fumadocs under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between jsdoc and Fumadocs?

jsdoc is written in JavaScript and Fumadocs in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, jsdoc or Fumadocs?

Choose jsdoc if you want the larger community (15,463 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose Fumadocs if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.