head to head · open source
invisible_dots vs claude-chat-exporter
invisible_dots has 32,357 GitHub stars, 4,739 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. claude-chat-exporter has 741 stars, 85 forks, 1 open issues and last shipped 11 days ago. invisible_dots leads on adoption by 4,267% (32,357 vs 741 stars). invisible_dots is written in TypeScript under MIT; claude-chat-exporter is written in JavaScript under MIT. invisible_dots has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, claude-chat-exporter 11%. invisible_dots was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| invisible_dots | claude-chat-exporter | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 32K | ★ 741 |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | JavaScript |
| Last push | 2026-10-31 | 2026-10-23 |
| Forks | ⑂ 4.7K | ⑂ 85 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick invisible_dots if
- You weight community size — 32K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick claude-chat-exporter if
- You want the claude-chat-exporter feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You evaluated both and claude-chat-exporter fits your workflow better
About invisible_dots
Open source, self hosted alternative to OpenAI Dots, Grok Bot. Built to be undetectable by anti bot systems. Quickstart You need Node 24+, Go 1.25+, Git and hardware virtualization (x86 64), plus an OpenRouter key. Windows (PowerShell): Linux (Ubuntu 24.04): setup all installs QEMU and turns on the accelerator (KVM, or the Windows Hypervisor Platform), then builds or downloads the Dot's images; run it again after a restart and it carries on. Then open paste your OpenRouter key and create your first Dot. Every step and its failure modes: the guide's quickstart. What to ask a Dot Anything that needs a computer and…
read the full invisible_dots overview →
About claude-chat-exporter
Claude Chat Exporter A privacy first tool that exports your Claude.ai conversations to clean Markdown. It runs entirely in your browser — no server of its own, nothing uploaded, no tracking. Everything comes through — tables, math and code at full fidelity, plus artifacts, created files, charts and attachments — all read directly from Claude's own API. Exports carry YAML frontmatter with one heading per turn, so they drop straight into an Obsidian vault or a RAG pipeline. Claude's internal API changes without notice, and someone has to keep up. Sponsoring this project is what keeps it maintained. More → ⚡ One…
read the full claude-chat-exporter overview →
More in AI & Machine Learning
Related comparisons
More AI Interaction & Interfaces projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Interaction & Interfaces field.
Frequently asked questions
Is invisible_dots or claude-chat-exporter more popular?
invisible_dots has 32,357 GitHub stars and claude-chat-exporter has 741. invisible_dots has the larger community by that measure.
Are invisible_dots and claude-chat-exporter free?
Both are open source. invisible_dots is licensed under MIT and claude-chat-exporter under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between invisible_dots and claude-chat-exporter?
invisible_dots is written in TypeScript and claude-chat-exporter in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, invisible_dots or claude-chat-exporter?
Choose invisible_dots if you want the larger community (32,357 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose claude-chat-exporter if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.