head to head · open source

homeland vs jivejdon

homeland has 3,859 GitHub stars, 1,176 forks, 27 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. jivejdon has 588 stars, 160 forks, 5 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. homeland leads on adoption by 556% (3,859 vs 588 stars). homeland is written in Ruby under MIT; jivejdon is written in Java under Apache-2.0. homeland has attracted 30% as many forks as stars, jivejdon 27%. jivejdon was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (forum), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

homeland ★ 3.9K jivejdon ★ 588 category Content & Publishing

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

homeland jivejdon
GitHub stars ★ 3.9K ★ 588
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in Ruby Java
Last push 2026-08-08 2026-09-13
Forks ⑂ 1.2K ⑂ 160
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick homeland if

  • You weight community size — 3.9K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Ruby
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full homeland profile →

pick jivejdon if

  • You want the jivejdon feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You evaluated both and jivejdon fits your workflow better

full jivejdon profile →

About homeland

Homeland is an open source forum and community system written in Ruby and built on Ruby on Rails. It is described as an open source discussion website, and its tagline says that it was developed based on Ruby China. That places it in the community platform category, where the main purpose is to operate a discussion website.

read the full homeland overview →

About jivejdon

Jivejdon is a Java, Apache 2.0 licensed chain notebook and knowledge system that combines DDD, domain events, event sourcing, CQRS and clean/hexagonal architecture to link blog and forum posts into a knowledge graph — built for enterprises and teams that want to run their own internal knowledge system rather than a flat publishing CMS.

read the full jivejdon overview →

More in Content & Publishing

next.js ★ 142K storybook ★ 91K hugo ★ 90K Understand-Anything ★ 83K Strapi ★ 73K nuxt ★ 61K

Related comparisons

discourse vs homeland discourse vs flarum discourse vs paopao-ce discourse vs bbs-go discourse vs symphony discourse vs misago discourse vs kun-galgame-forum discourse vs scoold next-js vs nuxt next-js vs gatsby next-js vs ghost next-js vs jekyll next-js vs hexo next-js vs nextra next-js vs kit next-js vs vike storybook vs understand-anything storybook vs devdocs storybook vs docsify understand-anything vs devdocs storybook vs wiki storybook vs mkdocs-material understand-anything vs docsify understand-anything vs wiki

More Community Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Community Platforms field.

homeland vs Discourse homeland vs Flarum homeland vs answer homeland vs paopao-ce homeland vs bbs-go homeland vs symphony homeland vs Misago homeland vs kun-galgame-forum homeland vs scoold homeland vs nimforum homeland vs Nameless homeland vs Valour

Frequently asked questions

Is homeland or jivejdon more popular?

homeland has 3,859 GitHub stars and jivejdon has 588. homeland has the larger community by that measure.

Are homeland and jivejdon free?

Both are open source. homeland is licensed under MIT and jivejdon under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between homeland and jivejdon?

homeland is written in Ruby and jivejdon in Java. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, homeland or jivejdon?

Choose homeland if you want the larger community (3,859 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose jivejdon if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.