head to head · open source
hexo vs wordpress-static-site-exporter
hexo has 41,776 GitHub stars, 56 forks, 75 open issues and last shipped 20 days ago. wordpress-static-site-exporter has 1,082 stars, 130 forks, 2 open issues and last shipped yesterday. hexo leads on adoption by 3,761% (41,776 vs 1,082 stars). hexo is written in TypeScript under MIT; wordpress-static-site-exporter is written in PHP under GPL-3.0. hexo has attracted 0% as many forks as stars, wordpress-static-site-exporter 12%. wordpress-static-site-exporter was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (static-site-generator), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| hexo | wordpress-static-site-exporter | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 42K | ★ 1.1K |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Written in | TypeScript | PHP |
| Last push | 2026-10-26 | 2026-11-14 |
| Forks | ⑂ 56 | ⑂ 130 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick hexo if
- You weight community size — 42K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick wordpress-static-site-exporter if
- You want the wordpress-static-site-exporter feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches PHP
- You evaluated both and wordpress-static-site-exporter fits your workflow better
About hexo
Hexo A fast, simple & powerful blog framework, powered by Node.js. Website Documentation Installation Guide Contribution Guide Code of Conduct API Twitter Features Blazing fast generating Support for GitHub Flavored Markdown and most Octopress plugins One command deploy to GitHub Pages, Heroku, etc. Powerful API for limitless extensibility Hundreds of themes & plugins Quick Start Install Hexo Install with brew on macOS and Linux: Setup your blog Start the server Create a new post Generate static files More Information Read the documentation Visit the Awesome Hexo list Find solutions in troubleshooting Join…
About wordpress-static-site-exporter
Static Site Exporter: WordPress to Jekyll and Hugo Markdown exporter One click WordPress plugin that converts all posts, pages, taxonomies, metadata, and settings to Markdown and YAML which can be dropped into Jekyll (or Hugo or any other Markdown and YAML based site engine). View plugin in the WordPress plugin directory. Features Converts all posts, pages, and settings from WordPress to Markdown and YAML for use in Jekyll (or Hugo or any other Markdown and YAML based site engine) Export what your users see, not what the database stores (runs post content through the content filter prior to export, allowing…
read the full wordpress-static-site-exporter overview →
More in Content & Publishing
Related comparisons
More Blogging & Personal Sites projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Blogging & Personal Sites field.
Frequently asked questions
Is hexo or wordpress-static-site-exporter more popular?
hexo has 41,776 GitHub stars and wordpress-static-site-exporter has 1,082. hexo has the larger community by that measure.
Are hexo and wordpress-static-site-exporter free?
Both are open source. hexo is licensed under MIT and wordpress-static-site-exporter under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between hexo and wordpress-static-site-exporter?
hexo is written in TypeScript and wordpress-static-site-exporter in PHP. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, hexo or wordpress-static-site-exporter?
Choose hexo if you want the larger community (41,776 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose wordpress-static-site-exporter if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.