head to head · open source

helix vs Kilo

helix has 46,270 GitHub stars, 3,758 forks, 1,671 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. Kilo has 27,355 stars, 3,174 forks, 586 open issues and last shipped yesterday. helix leads on adoption by 69% (46,270 vs 27,355 stars). helix is written in Rust under MPL-2.0; Kilo is written in TypeScript under MIT. helix has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, Kilo 12%. Kilo was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

helix ★ 46K Kilo ★ 27K category Developer Tools

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

helix Kilo
GitHub stars ★ 46K ★ 27K
License MPL-2.0 MIT
Written in Rust TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-15 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 3.8K ⑂ 3.2K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick helix if

  • You weight community size — 46K stars and counting
  • You want the MPL-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full helix profile →

pick Kilo if

  • You want the Kilo feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and Kilo fits your workflow better

full Kilo profile →

About helix

Helix is a post modern modal text editor written in Rust that brings the selection first Kakoune editing model to the terminal, aimed at developers who want Vim style modal editing with language tooling built into the editor rather than assembled from a plugin stack.

read the full helix overview →

About Kilo

Kilo is an open source AI coding agent platform that integrates into VS Code, JetBrains IDEs, the CLI, and cloud environments. It enables developers to build, ship, and iterate faster by acting as an autonomous or semi autonomous coding assistant across their entire workflow. Built in TypeScript and licensed under MIT, it supports 500+ models—including GPT 5.5, Claude Opus 4.7, Claude Sonnet 4.6, and Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview—without vendor lock in or markup.

read the full Kilo overview →

More in Developer Tools

ECC ★ 262K react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 208K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K

Related comparisons

react vs kilocode react vs vscode react vs neovim react vs zed opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed vscode vs neovim vscode vs zed openclaw vs langflow react vs langflow react vs supabase n8n vs langflow react vs pocketbase langflow vs langchain react vs tooljet react vs appsmith openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip

More IDEs & Code Editors projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the IDEs & Code Editors field.

helix vs vscode helix vs Neovim helix vs Zed helix vs code-server helix vs vscodium helix vs NvChad helix vs CodeEdit helix vs terax-ai helix vs lite-xl helix vs react-ace

Frequently asked questions

Is helix or Kilo more popular?

helix has 46,270 GitHub stars and Kilo has 27,355. helix has the larger community by that measure.

Are helix and Kilo free?

Both are open source. helix is licensed under MPL-2.0 and Kilo under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between helix and Kilo?

helix is written in Rust and Kilo in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, helix or Kilo?

Choose helix if you want the larger community (46,270 stars) or its MPL-2.0 licence terms. Choose Kilo if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.