head to head · open source

gs-quant vs SnapOtter

gs-quant has 12,974 GitHub stars, 1,752 forks, 73 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. SnapOtter has 2,685 stars, 136 forks, 208 open issues and last shipped yesterday. gs-quant leads on adoption by 383% (12,974 vs 2,685 stars). gs-quant is written in Python under Apache-2.0; SnapOtter is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0. gs-quant has attracted 14% as many forks as stars, SnapOtter 5%. SnapOtter was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

gs-quant ★ 13K SnapOtter ★ 2.7K category Business Software

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

gs-quant SnapOtter
GitHub stars ★ 13K ★ 2.7K
License Apache-2.0 AGPL-3.0
Written in Python TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-16 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 1.8K ⑂ 136
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick gs-quant if

  • You weight community size — 13K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full gs-quant profile →

pick SnapOtter if

  • You want the SnapOtter feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and SnapOtter fits your workflow better

full SnapOtter profile →

About gs-quant

GS Quant is an Apache 2.0 Python toolkit for quantitative finance, maintained by quantitative developers at Goldman Sachs, and it is intended for quants and institutional clients of the bank who build derivative pricing, trading strategy and risk management workflows on top of Goldman Sachs' risk transfer platform.

read the full gs-quant overview →

About SnapOtter

SnapOtter is an open source, self hosted file processing tool in TypeScript under AGPL 3.0. It provides a UI, REST API, and pipelines for conversion, compression, editing, OCR, transcription, metadata stripping, and local AI across images, video, audio, PDFs, and documents. It lives in the Docker based self hosted software ecosystem, where teams process media and documents on owned hardware instead of external services.

read the full SnapOtter overview →

More in Business Software

Plane ★ 60K Twenty ★ 57K Odoo ★ 54K Cal.com ★ 49K Rocket.Chat ★ 46K cobalt ★ 43K

Related comparisons

lighthouse vs gs-quant lighthouse vs teleport lighthouse vs lynis lighthouse vs prowler lighthouse vs opa lighthouse vs amphion lighthouse vs checkov lighthouse vs kyverno plane vs rocket-chat plane vs cobalt plane vs buzz rocket-chat vs cobalt plane vs jitsi plane vs srs plane vs huly plane vs zulip plane vs anki twenty vs anki odoo vs anki cal-com vs anki plane vs tutor twenty vs tutor odoo vs tutor cal-com vs tutor

More Compliance & Risk Management projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Compliance & Risk Management field.

gs-quant vs lighthouse gs-quant vs teleport gs-quant vs lynis gs-quant vs prowler gs-quant vs opa gs-quant vs Amphion gs-quant vs checkov gs-quant vs kyverno gs-quant vs aircrack-ng gs-quant vs tfsec gs-quant vs rundeck gs-quant vs agent-governance-toolkit

Frequently asked questions

Is gs-quant or SnapOtter more popular?

gs-quant has 12,974 GitHub stars and SnapOtter has 2,685. gs-quant has the larger community by that measure.

Are gs-quant and SnapOtter free?

Both are open source. gs-quant is licensed under Apache-2.0 and SnapOtter under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between gs-quant and SnapOtter?

gs-quant is written in Python and SnapOtter in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, gs-quant or SnapOtter?

Choose gs-quant if you want the larger community (12,974 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose SnapOtter if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.