head to head · open source
gs-quant vs SnapOtter
gs-quant has 13,876 GitHub stars, 1,928 forks, 73 open issues and last shipped 6 days ago. SnapOtter has 2,929 stars, 174 forks, 208 open issues and last shipped yesterday. gs-quant leads on adoption by 374% (13,876 vs 2,929 stars). gs-quant is written in Python under Apache-2.0; SnapOtter is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0. gs-quant has attracted 14% as many forks as stars, SnapOtter 6%. SnapOtter was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| gs-quant | SnapOtter | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 14K | ★ 2.9K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Written in | Python | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-10-28 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.9K | ⑂ 174 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick gs-quant if
- You weight community size — 14K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick SnapOtter if
- You want the SnapOtter feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and SnapOtter fits your workflow better
About gs-quant
GS Quant GS Quant is a Python toolkit for quantitative finance, created on top of one of the world’s most powerful risk transfer platforms. Designed to accelerate development of quantitative trading strategies and risk management solutions, crafted over 25 years of experience navigating global markets. It is created and maintained by quantitative developers (quants) at Goldman Sachs to enable the development of trading strategies and analysis of derivative products. GS Quant can be used to facilitate derivative structuring, trading, and risk management, or as a set of statistical packages for data analytics…
read the full gs-quant overview →
About SnapOtter
Open source, self hosted file processing infrastructure. Convert, compress, OCR, transcribe, strip metadata, and run local AI across image, video, audio, PDF, and documents, through a UI, REST API, and pipelines. Your files never leave your network. The one self hosted stack that replaces CloudConvert, Smallpdf, TinyPNG, TinyWow, and Otter.ai. 200+ tools across five modalities, on hardware you own. Stirling PDF stops at PDFs. ConvertX stops at conversions. SnapOtter runs all five, and your files never leave your server. Edit images, convert video, transcribe audio, repair PDFs, batch your files: one Docker…
read the full SnapOtter overview →
More in Business Software
Related comparisons
More Compliance & Risk Management projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Compliance & Risk Management field.
Frequently asked questions
Is gs-quant or SnapOtter more popular?
gs-quant has 13,876 GitHub stars and SnapOtter has 2,929. gs-quant has the larger community by that measure.
Are gs-quant and SnapOtter free?
Both are open source. gs-quant is licensed under Apache-2.0 and SnapOtter under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between gs-quant and SnapOtter?
gs-quant is written in Python and SnapOtter in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, gs-quant or SnapOtter?
Choose gs-quant if you want the larger community (13,876 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose SnapOtter if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.