head to head · open source

gs-quant vs polaris

gs-quant has 12,974 GitHub stars, 1,752 forks, 73 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. polaris has 3,387 stars, 231 forks, 17 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. gs-quant leads on adoption by 283% (12,974 vs 3,387 stars). gs-quant is written in Python under Apache-2.0; polaris is written in Go under Apache-2.0. gs-quant has attracted 14% as many forks as stars, polaris 7%. polaris was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

gs-quant ★ 13K polaris ★ 3.4K category Business Software

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

gs-quant polaris
GitHub stars ★ 13K ★ 3.4K
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Python Go
Last push 2026-09-16 2026-09-16
Forks ⑂ 1.8K ⑂ 231
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick gs-quant if

  • You weight community size — 13K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full gs-quant profile →

pick polaris if

  • You want the polaris feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and polaris fits your workflow better

full polaris profile →

About gs-quant

GS Quant is an Apache 2.0 Python toolkit for quantitative finance, maintained by quantitative developers at Goldman Sachs, and it is intended for quants and institutional clients of the bank who build derivative pricing, trading strategy and risk management workflows on top of Goldman Sachs' risk transfer platform.

read the full gs-quant overview →

About polaris

Polaris is an open source policy engine for Kubernetes, written in Go and released under the Apache 2.0 license. It lives in the Kubernetes ecosystem and supports cluster auditing, best practice validation, and a dashboard.

read the full polaris overview →

More in Business Software

Plane ★ 60K Twenty ★ 57K Odoo ★ 54K Cal.com ★ 49K Rocket.Chat ★ 46K cobalt ★ 43K

Related comparisons

lighthouse vs gs-quant lighthouse vs teleport lighthouse vs lynis lighthouse vs prowler lighthouse vs opa lighthouse vs amphion lighthouse vs checkov lighthouse vs kyverno plane vs rocket-chat plane vs cobalt plane vs buzz rocket-chat vs cobalt plane vs jitsi plane vs srs plane vs huly plane vs zulip plane vs anki twenty vs anki odoo vs anki cal-com vs anki plane vs tutor twenty vs tutor odoo vs tutor cal-com vs tutor

More Compliance & Risk Management projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Compliance & Risk Management field.

gs-quant vs lighthouse gs-quant vs teleport gs-quant vs lynis gs-quant vs prowler gs-quant vs opa gs-quant vs Amphion gs-quant vs checkov gs-quant vs kyverno gs-quant vs aircrack-ng gs-quant vs tfsec gs-quant vs rundeck gs-quant vs agent-governance-toolkit

Frequently asked questions

Is gs-quant or polaris more popular?

gs-quant has 12,974 GitHub stars and polaris has 3,387. gs-quant has the larger community by that measure.

Are gs-quant and polaris free?

Both are open source. gs-quant is licensed under Apache-2.0 and polaris under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between gs-quant and polaris?

gs-quant is written in Python and polaris in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, gs-quant or polaris?

Choose gs-quant if you want the larger community (12,974 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose polaris if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.