head to head · open source

gs-quant vs next-terminal

gs-quant has 12,974 GitHub stars, 1,752 forks, 73 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. next-terminal has 5,636 stars, 781 forks, 8 open issues and last shipped yesterday. gs-quant leads on adoption by 130% (12,974 vs 5,636 stars). gs-quant is written in Python under Apache-2.0; next-terminal is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0. gs-quant has attracted 14% as many forks as stars, next-terminal 14%. next-terminal was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

gs-quant ★ 13K next-terminal ★ 5.6K category Business Software

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

gs-quant next-terminal
GitHub stars ★ 13K ★ 5.6K
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Python TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-16 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 1.8K ⑂ 781
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick gs-quant if

  • You weight community size — 13K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full gs-quant profile →

pick next-terminal if

  • You want the next-terminal feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and next-terminal fits your workflow better

full next-terminal profile →

About gs-quant

GS Quant is an Apache 2.0 Python toolkit for quantitative finance, maintained by quantitative developers at Goldman Sachs, and it is intended for quants and institutional clients of the bank who build derivative pricing, trading strategy and risk management workflows on top of Goldman Sachs' risk transfer platform.

read the full gs-quant overview →

About next-terminal

Next Terminal is a self hosted bastion and session auditing system for enterprise IT teams that need recorded, replayable access to remote machines over RDP, SSH, VNC, Telnet, and HTTP.

read the full next-terminal overview →

More in Business Software

Plane ★ 60K Twenty ★ 57K Odoo ★ 54K Cal.com ★ 49K Rocket.Chat ★ 46K cobalt ★ 43K

Related comparisons

lighthouse vs gs-quant lighthouse vs teleport lighthouse vs lynis lighthouse vs prowler lighthouse vs opa lighthouse vs amphion lighthouse vs checkov lighthouse vs kyverno plane vs rocket-chat plane vs cobalt plane vs buzz rocket-chat vs cobalt plane vs jitsi plane vs srs plane vs huly plane vs zulip plane vs anki twenty vs anki odoo vs anki cal-com vs anki plane vs tutor twenty vs tutor odoo vs tutor cal-com vs tutor

More Compliance & Risk Management projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Compliance & Risk Management field.

gs-quant vs lighthouse gs-quant vs teleport gs-quant vs lynis gs-quant vs prowler gs-quant vs opa gs-quant vs Amphion gs-quant vs checkov gs-quant vs kyverno gs-quant vs aircrack-ng gs-quant vs tfsec gs-quant vs rundeck gs-quant vs agent-governance-toolkit

Frequently asked questions

Is gs-quant or next-terminal more popular?

gs-quant has 12,974 GitHub stars and next-terminal has 5,636. gs-quant has the larger community by that measure.

Are gs-quant and next-terminal free?

Both are open source. gs-quant is licensed under Apache-2.0 and next-terminal under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between gs-quant and next-terminal?

gs-quant is written in Python and next-terminal in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, gs-quant or next-terminal?

Choose gs-quant if you want the larger community (12,974 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose next-terminal if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.