head to head · open source

starrocks vs growth-lab

starrocks has 12,125 GitHub stars, 2,594 forks, 1,443 open issues and last shipped today. growth-lab has 1,988 stars, 170 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. starrocks leads on adoption by 510% (12,125 vs 1,988 stars). starrocks is written in Java under Apache-2.0; growth-lab is written in Python under Apache-2.0. starrocks has attracted 21% as many forks as stars, growth-lab 9%. starrocks was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

starrocks ★ 12K growth-lab ★ 2.0K category Business Software

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

starrocks growth-lab
GitHub stars ★ 12K ★ 2.0K
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Java Python
Last push 2026-09-20 2026-08-11
Forks ⑂ 2.6K ⑂ 170
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick starrocks if

  • You weight community size — 12K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full starrocks profile →

pick growth-lab if

  • You want the growth-lab feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and growth-lab fits your workflow better

full growth-lab profile →

About starrocks

StarRocks is an Apache 2.0, Linux Foundation open query engine written in Java that delivers sub second ad hoc and multi dimensional analytics both on and off the data lakehouse, built for data platform teams, analytics engineers, and BI users who need fast SQL over large distributed datasets without moving data or rewriting SQL.

read the full starrocks overview →

About growth-lab

Growth Lab is an open source Python growth tool in the business software and marketing customer engagement ecosystem. It understands a product, fetches needed data, researches the market, executes campaign actions, and reviews results to improve the next growth round. It runs inside Codex or Claude Code as the application runtime.

read the full growth-lab overview →

More in Business Software

Plane ★ 60K Twenty ★ 57K Odoo ★ 54K Cal.com ★ 49K Rocket.Chat ★ 46K cobalt ★ 44K

Related comparisons

duckdb vs krayin duckdb vs listmonk duckdb vs goaccess duckdb vs excelize duckdb vs claude-seo duckdb vs billion-mail duckdb vs billionmail duckdb vs mysql opencode vs vibe-kanban conductor vs vibe-kanban vibe-kanban vs wekan vibe-kanban vs qinglong vibe-kanban vs edict vibe-kanban vs openproject vibe-kanban vs onedev wekan vs qinglong plane vs rocket-chat plane vs cobalt plane vs buzz rocket-chat vs cobalt plane vs jitsi plane vs srs plane vs huly plane vs zulip

More Marketing & Customer Engagement projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Marketing & Customer Engagement field.

starrocks vs duckdb starrocks vs Krayin starrocks vs Listmonk starrocks vs goaccess starrocks vs excelize starrocks vs claude-seo starrocks vs Billion Mail starrocks vs BillionMail starrocks vs dbt starrocks vs trino starrocks vs perspective starrocks vs Kutt

Frequently asked questions

Is starrocks or growth-lab more popular?

starrocks has 12,125 GitHub stars and growth-lab has 1,988. starrocks has the larger community by that measure.

Are starrocks and growth-lab free?

Both are open source. starrocks is licensed under Apache-2.0 and growth-lab under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between starrocks and growth-lab?

starrocks is written in Java and growth-lab in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, starrocks or growth-lab?

Choose starrocks if you want the larger community (12,125 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose growth-lab if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.