head to head · open source

GreaterWMS vs Part-DB-server

GreaterWMS has 4,429 GitHub stars, 1,176 forks, 77 open issues and last shipped 8 days ago. Part-DB-server has 1,824 stars, 251 forks, 209 open issues and last shipped yesterday. GreaterWMS leads on adoption by 143% (4,429 vs 1,824 stars). GreaterWMS is written in Python under Apache-2.0; Part-DB-server is written in PHP under AGPL-3.0. GreaterWMS has attracted 27% as many forks as stars, Part-DB-server 14%. Part-DB-server was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 3 topic tags (inventory, inventory-management, inventory-management-system), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

GreaterWMS ★ 4.4K Part-DB-server ★ 1.8K category Business Software

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

GreaterWMS Part-DB-server
GitHub stars ★ 4.4K ★ 1.8K
License Apache-2.0 AGPL-3.0
Written in Python PHP
Last push 2026-10-26 2026-11-02
Forks ⑂ 1.2K ⑂ 251
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick GreaterWMS if

  • You weight community size — 4.4K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full GreaterWMS profile →

pick Part-DB-server if

  • You want the Part-DB-server feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches PHP
  • You evaluated both and Part-DB-server fits your workflow better

full Part-DB-server profile →

About GreaterWMS

GreaterWMS 完全开源的仓库管理系统 —— 为你的业务而定制 🎬 开源版本功能视频介绍 想快速了解 GreaterWMS 能做什么?我们录制了完整的开源版本功能演示,涵盖入库、出库、库存管理、PDA 扫描等核心操作流程。 👉 点击观看 GreaterWMS 开源版本功能视频 🔓 为什么选择 GreaterWMS ​ 传统的商业 WMS 软件往往闭源且难以二次开发,企业一旦选择某款软件,二次开发就会被开发公司绑定,费用高昂且周期漫长。GreaterWMS 的诞生正是为了解决这个问题——作者在供应链行业工作 15 年,深知行业内缺乏一款 高自由度、高自定义化 的软件来深度支持企业业务。GreaterWMS 的设计初衷就是 为定制而生 :无论你是仅构建进销存、仓库管理,还是需要对接物联网、ERP 和分销系统,GreaterWMS 都能作为你的基础平台。 Bomiot 底层框架赋能 GreaterWMS 3.0 正在基于 Bomiot 框架重构。Bomiot 用 Rust 编写核心,提供插件化架构、应用市场(pip 安装即可扩展)、信号机制等能力,让 定制开发和功能扩展变得更加高效 。 GreaterWMS 也将使用Bomiot,进行3.0重构 🎯 定制化能力 前后端分离架构 系统采用 Django REST Framework 后端 + Quasar (Vue.js) 前端的分离架构,API 遵循…

read the full GreaterWMS overview →

About Part-DB-server

Documentation Demo Docker Image Part DB Part DB is an Open Source inventory management system for your electronic components. It is installed on a web server and so can be accessed with any browser without the need to install additional software. The version in this repository is a complete rewrite of the legacy Part DB (Version Features Inventory management of your electronic parts. Each part can be assigned to a category, footprint, manufacturer, and multiple store locations and price information. Parts can be grouped using tags. You can associate various files like datasheets or pictures with the parts. Multi…

read the full Part-DB-server overview →

More in Business Software

Related comparisons

More ERP & Operations projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the ERP & Operations field.

Frequently asked questions

Is GreaterWMS or Part-DB-server more popular?

GreaterWMS has 4,429 GitHub stars and Part-DB-server has 1,824. GreaterWMS has the larger community by that measure.

Are GreaterWMS and Part-DB-server free?

Both are open source. GreaterWMS is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Part-DB-server under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between GreaterWMS and Part-DB-server?

GreaterWMS is written in Python and Part-DB-server in PHP. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, GreaterWMS or Part-DB-server?

Choose GreaterWMS if you want the larger community (4,429 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose Part-DB-server if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.