head to head · open source

graphify vs ruby_llm

graphify has 119,123 GitHub stars, 11,519 forks, 1,350 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. ruby_llm has 4,379 stars, 501 forks, 7 open issues and last shipped yesterday. graphify leads on adoption by 2,620% (119,123 vs 4,379 stars). graphify is written in Python under Apache-2.0; ruby_llm is written in Ruby under MIT. graphify has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, ruby_llm 11%. ruby_llm was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (gemini), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

graphify ★ 119K ruby_llm ★ 4.4K category AI & Machine Learning

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

graphify ruby_llm
GitHub stars ★ 119K ★ 4.4K
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in Python Ruby
Last push 2026-09-16 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 12K ⑂ 501
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick graphify if

  • You weight community size — 119K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full graphify profile →

pick ruby_llm if

  • You want the ruby_llm feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Ruby
  • You evaluated both and ruby_llm fits your workflow better

full ruby_llm profile →

About graphify

graphify is an Apache 2.0 Python CLI and /graphify skill that turns a whole project — code, docs, SQL schemas, configs, PDFs, images, and video — into a queryable knowledge graph, built for developers and AI agent users in Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, and Gemini CLI who want to query a codebase instead of grepping through files.

read the full graphify overview →

About ruby_llm

RubyLLM is the Ruby native AI framework that gives Ruby and Rails applications chats, agents, tools, images, audio, and video through one consistent API spanning 17 providers.

read the full ruby_llm overview →

More in AI & Machine Learning

OpenClaw ★ 390K Hermes Agent ★ 247K Ollama ★ 181K Dify ★ 156K Open WebUI ★ 152K langchain ★ 147K

Related comparisons

dify vs graphify langchain vs graphify ponytail vs graphify dify vs langchain dify vs ponytail langchain vs ponytail dify vs claude-mem dify vs ragflow openclaw vs hermes-agent openclaw vs open-webui openclaw vs lobechat openclaw vs anythingllm openclaw vs cherry-studio openclaw vs nanobot openclaw vs jan openclaw vs librechat ollama vs llama-cpp ollama vs vllm ollama vs gpt4all ollama vs llama-index ollama vs localai llama-cpp vs vllm ollama vs pageindex ollama vs langfuse

More AI Development Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Development Platforms field.

graphify vs Dify graphify vs langchain graphify vs ponytail graphify vs generative-ai-for-beginners graphify vs claude-mem graphify vs ragflow graphify vs PaddleOCR graphify vs Agent-Reach graphify vs headroom graphify vs Mem0 graphify vs daily_stock_analysis graphify vs LiteLLM

Frequently asked questions

Is graphify or ruby_llm more popular?

graphify has 119,123 GitHub stars and ruby_llm has 4,379. graphify has the larger community by that measure.

Are graphify and ruby_llm free?

Both are open source. graphify is licensed under Apache-2.0 and ruby_llm under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between graphify and ruby_llm?

graphify is written in Python and ruby_llm in Ruby. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, graphify or ruby_llm?

Choose graphify if you want the larger community (119,123 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose ruby_llm if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.