head to head · open source

graphify vs OpenBiliClaw

graphify has 141,064 GitHub stars, 13,483 forks, 1,350 open issues and last shipped yesterday. OpenBiliClaw has 3,661 stars, 199 forks, 25 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. graphify leads on adoption by 3,753% (141,064 vs 3,661 stars). graphify is written in Python under Apache-2.0; OpenBiliClaw is written in Python under MIT. graphify has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, OpenBiliClaw 5%. graphify was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

graphify ★ 141K OpenBiliClaw ★ 3.7K category AI & Machine Learning

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

graphify OpenBiliClaw
GitHub stars ★ 141K ★ 3.7K
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in Python Python
Last push 2026-11-02 2026-10-30
Forks ⑂ 13K ⑂ 199
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick graphify if

  • You weight community size — 141K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full graphify profile →

pick OpenBiliClaw if

  • You want the OpenBiliClaw feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and OpenBiliClaw fits your workflow better

full OpenBiliClaw profile →

About graphify

Read this in other languages 🇺🇸 English 🇨🇳 简体中文 🇯🇵 日本語 🇰🇷 한국어 🇩🇪 Deutsch 🇫🇷 Français 🇪🇸 Español 🇮🇳 हिन्दी 🇧🇷 Português 🇷🇺 Русский 🇸🇦 العربية 🇮🇷 فارسی 🇮🇹 Italiano 🇵🇱 Polski 🇳🇱 Nederlands 🇹🇷 Türkçe 🇺🇦 Українська 🇻🇳 Tiếng Việt 🇮🇩 Bahasa Indonesia 🇸🇪 Svenska 🇬🇷 Ελληνικά 🇷🇴 Română 🇨🇿 Čeština 🇫🇮 Suomi 🇩🇰 Dansk 🇳🇴 Norsk 🇭🇺 Magyar 🇹🇭 ภาษาไทย 🇺🇿 Oʻzbekcha 🇹🇼 繁體中文 🇵🇭 Filipino 🇮🇱 עברית Early access to the graphify platform is open before the public v1 launch: app.graphify.com Type /graphify in your AI coding assistant and it maps your entire project (code…

read the full graphify overview →

About OpenBiliClaw

🦀 OpenBiliClaw 通用个性化内容推荐 Agent——本地运行、跨平台理解你、只为你一个人构建 A general purpose personalized content discovery Agent — runs on your machine, understands only you 项目主页 English 中文 国内 AtomGit 托管:OpenBiliClaw(从 GitHub 自动同步源码) 🆕 重要更新:OpenBiliClaw 现在可以装进 DeepSeek Harness 新增 DSH 客户端插件 —— 把 OpenBiliClaw 装进 DeepSeek Harness:DSH 界面常驻第四栏(推荐 / 内容库 / 对话 / 画像 / 设置),并注册 22 个 Agent Bridge 工具,让 DSH 里的 Agent 也能读推荐、答探测、闭环学习——边用 DSH 干活,边刷跨平台个性化内容。→ github.com/whiteguo233/dsh openbiliclaw 📱 想要原生 App?Flutter 移动端客户端(Android / iOS / Web / 桌面)在独立仓库 OpenBiliClaw mobile :推荐、对话、画像、收藏 / 稍后再看 / 30 天历史一应俱全,连接同一本地后端。 🇨🇳 国内下载(当前 v0.3.221) :7…

read the full OpenBiliClaw overview →

More in AI & Machine Learning

Related comparisons

More AI Development Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Development Platforms field.

Frequently asked questions

Is graphify or OpenBiliClaw more popular?

graphify has 141,064 GitHub stars and OpenBiliClaw has 3,661. graphify has the larger community by that measure.

Are graphify and OpenBiliClaw free?

Both are open source. graphify is licensed under Apache-2.0 and OpenBiliClaw under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between graphify and OpenBiliClaw?

graphify is written in Python and OpenBiliClaw in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, graphify or OpenBiliClaw?

Choose graphify if you want the larger community (141,064 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose OpenBiliClaw if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.