head to head · open source

graphify vs maka

graphify has 119,123 GitHub stars, 11,519 forks, 1,350 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. maka has 5,549 stars, 514 forks, 481 open issues and last shipped today. graphify leads on adoption by 2,047% (119,123 vs 5,549 stars). graphify is written in Python under Apache-2.0; maka is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0. graphify has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, maka 9%. maka was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

graphify ★ 119K maka ★ 5.5K category AI & Machine Learning

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

graphify maka
GitHub stars ★ 119K ★ 5.5K
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Python TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-16 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 12K ⑂ 514
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick graphify if

  • You weight community size — 119K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full graphify profile →

pick maka if

  • You want the maka feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and maka fits your workflow better

full maka profile →

About graphify

graphify is an Apache 2.0 Python CLI and /graphify skill that turns a whole project — code, docs, SQL schemas, configs, PDFs, images, and video — into a queryable knowledge graph, built for developers and AI agent users in Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, and Gemini CLI who want to query a codebase instead of grepping through files.

read the full graphify overview →

About maka

Apache Maka (Incubating) is a TypeScript, Apache 2.0 licensed agent workspace for developers and teams who run LLM agents on their own machines and need a complete, verifiable record of everything those agents did.

read the full maka overview →

More in AI & Machine Learning

OpenClaw ★ 390K Hermes Agent ★ 247K Ollama ★ 181K Dify ★ 156K Open WebUI ★ 152K langchain ★ 147K

Related comparisons

dify vs graphify langchain vs graphify ponytail vs graphify dify vs langchain dify vs ponytail langchain vs ponytail dify vs claude-mem dify vs ragflow openclaw vs hermes-agent openclaw vs open-webui openclaw vs lobechat openclaw vs anythingllm openclaw vs cherry-studio openclaw vs nanobot openclaw vs jan openclaw vs librechat ollama vs llama-cpp ollama vs vllm ollama vs gpt4all ollama vs llama-index ollama vs localai llama-cpp vs vllm ollama vs pageindex ollama vs langfuse

More AI Development Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Development Platforms field.

graphify vs Dify graphify vs langchain graphify vs ponytail graphify vs generative-ai-for-beginners graphify vs claude-mem graphify vs ragflow graphify vs PaddleOCR graphify vs Agent-Reach graphify vs headroom graphify vs Mem0 graphify vs daily_stock_analysis graphify vs LiteLLM

Frequently asked questions

Is graphify or maka more popular?

graphify has 119,123 GitHub stars and maka has 5,549. graphify has the larger community by that measure.

Are graphify and maka free?

Both are open source. graphify is licensed under Apache-2.0 and maka under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between graphify and maka?

graphify is written in Python and maka in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, graphify or maka?

Choose graphify if you want the larger community (119,123 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose maka if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.