head to head · open source

graphify vs liteflow

graphify has 119,123 GitHub stars, 11,519 forks, 1,350 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. liteflow has 3,860 stars, 526 forks, 64 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. graphify leads on adoption by 2,986% (119,123 vs 3,860 stars). graphify is written in Python under Apache-2.0; liteflow is written in Java under Apache-2.0. graphify has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, liteflow 14%. graphify was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (ai-agents), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

graphify ★ 119K liteflow ★ 3.9K category AI & Machine Learning

← all 13541 open source comparisons

Side by side

graphify liteflow
GitHub stars ★ 119K ★ 3.9K
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Python Java
Last push 2026-09-16 2026-07-31
Forks ⑂ 12K ⑂ 526
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick graphify if

  • You weight community size — 119K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full graphify profile →

pick liteflow if

  • You want the liteflow feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You evaluated both and liteflow fits your workflow better

full liteflow profile →

About graphify

graphify is an Apache 2.0 Python CLI and /graphify skill that turns a whole project — code, docs, SQL schemas, configs, PDFs, images, and video — into a queryable knowledge graph, built for developers and AI agent users in Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, and Gemini CLI who want to query a codebase instead of grepping through files.

read the full graphify overview →

About liteflow

LiteFlow is an Apache 2.0 licensed, Java based component rule engine that drives complex business orchestration from a small DSL rule file — and, since v2.16.0, treats an AI Agent as a first class citizen that can be orchestrated shoulder to shoulder with ordinary business nodes.

read the full liteflow overview →

More in AI & Machine Learning

OpenClaw ★ 390K Hermes Agent ★ 247K Ollama ★ 181K Dify ★ 156K Open WebUI ★ 152K langchain ★ 147K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs dify openclaw vs multica openclaw vs langgraph n8n vs dify dify vs langflow dify vs open-webui dify vs langchain dify vs ponytail openclaw vs hermes-agent openclaw vs opencode openclaw vs n8n openclaw vs open-webui openclaw vs lobechat openclaw vs anythingllm hermes-agent vs opencode hermes-agent vs n8n openclaw vs ollama ollama vs llama-cpp ollama vs vllm ollama vs gpt4all ollama vs llama-index ollama vs localai open-webui vs gpt4all llama-cpp vs vllm

More AI Development Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Development Platforms field.

graphify vs Dify graphify vs langchain graphify vs ponytail graphify vs generative-ai-for-beginners graphify vs claude-mem graphify vs ragflow graphify vs PaddleOCR graphify vs Agent-Reach graphify vs headroom graphify vs Mem0 graphify vs daily_stock_analysis graphify vs LiteLLM

Frequently asked questions

Is graphify or liteflow more popular?

graphify has 119,123 GitHub stars and liteflow has 3,860. graphify has the larger community by that measure.

Are graphify and liteflow free?

Both are open source. graphify is licensed under Apache-2.0 and liteflow under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between graphify and liteflow?

graphify is written in Python and liteflow in Java. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, graphify or liteflow?

Choose graphify if you want the larger community (119,123 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose liteflow if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.